Последний отзыв
Очень интересная!
По всем вопросам обращайтесь на: info@litportal.ru
(©) 2003-2024.
✖
The Phantom World; or, The philosophy of spirits, apparitions, &c, &c.
Настройки чтения
Размер шрифта
Высота строк
Поля
Luke xiii. 16.
431
Matt. xvii. 14. Luke ix. 37.
432
Ezek. xxi. 21.
433
Hosea iv. 12.
434
Aug. lib. xiv. de Civit. Dei, c. 24.
435
Galen. de Differ. Sympt.
436
By M. Fransquin Chanoine de Taul.
437
Ludov. Vives, lib. i. de Veritate Fidei, p. 540.
438
M. de S. André, Lett. iii. sur les Maléfices.
439
Matt. ii. 13,14.
440
S. Aug. lib. ii. retract. c. 30.
441
Gen. xviii.
442
Tob. xii. 19.
443
M. Lock. de Intellectu Human. lib. iv. c. 3.
444
Tob. xii. 18, 19.
445
John xi. 39.
446
Job xxi. 25.
447
1 Kings xiii. 21, 22.
448
2 Kings iv.
449
Ezek. xxxvii. 1, 2, 3.
450
1 John xii. 2.
451
2 Kings viii. 5.
452
The reverend fathers the Bollandists, believed that the life of St. Stanislaus, which they had printed, was very old, and nearly of the time of the martyrdom of the saint; or at least that it was taken from a life by an author almost his cotemporary, and original. But since the first edition of this dissertation it has been observed to me that the thing was by no means certain; that M. Baillet, on the 7th of May, in the critical table of authors, asserts that the life of St. Stanislaus was only written 400 years after his death, from uncertain and mutilated memoirs. And in the life of the saint he owns that it is only the tradition of the writers of the country which can render credible the account of the resurrection of Pierre. The Abbé Fleuri, tom. xiii. of the Ecclesiastical History, l. 62, year 1079, does not agree either to what is written in that life or to what has followed it. At any rate, the miracle of the resurrection of Pierre is related as certain in a discourse of John de Polemac, delivered at the Council of Constance, 1433; tom. xii. Councils, p. 1397.
453
Matt. ix. 34.
454
Matt. xxvii. 53.
455
431
Matt. xvii. 14. Luke ix. 37.
432
Ezek. xxi. 21.
433
Hosea iv. 12.
434
Aug. lib. xiv. de Civit. Dei, c. 24.
435
Galen. de Differ. Sympt.
436
By M. Fransquin Chanoine de Taul.
437
Ludov. Vives, lib. i. de Veritate Fidei, p. 540.
438
M. de S. André, Lett. iii. sur les Maléfices.
439
Matt. ii. 13,14.
440
S. Aug. lib. ii. retract. c. 30.
441
Gen. xviii.
442
Tob. xii. 19.
443
M. Lock. de Intellectu Human. lib. iv. c. 3.
444
Tob. xii. 18, 19.
445
John xi. 39.
446
Job xxi. 25.
447
1 Kings xiii. 21, 22.
448
2 Kings iv.
449
Ezek. xxxvii. 1, 2, 3.
450
1 John xii. 2.
451
2 Kings viii. 5.
452
The reverend fathers the Bollandists, believed that the life of St. Stanislaus, which they had printed, was very old, and nearly of the time of the martyrdom of the saint; or at least that it was taken from a life by an author almost his cotemporary, and original. But since the first edition of this dissertation it has been observed to me that the thing was by no means certain; that M. Baillet, on the 7th of May, in the critical table of authors, asserts that the life of St. Stanislaus was only written 400 years after his death, from uncertain and mutilated memoirs. And in the life of the saint he owns that it is only the tradition of the writers of the country which can render credible the account of the resurrection of Pierre. The Abbé Fleuri, tom. xiii. of the Ecclesiastical History, l. 62, year 1079, does not agree either to what is written in that life or to what has followed it. At any rate, the miracle of the resurrection of Pierre is related as certain in a discourse of John de Polemac, delivered at the Council of Constance, 1433; tom. xii. Councils, p. 1397.
453
Matt. ix. 34.
454
Matt. xxvii. 53.
455
Последний отзыв
Очень интересная!