We may, and usually do, find timeless truths present in the Bible, but it is because they were true in real places for real people at real times.
I heard somebody recently refer to the Bible as “data.” That person was in an intense discussion about what the Bible teaches about a certain issue, and he disagreed with someone else so he said, “I don’t see the data for your position.”
Data?
The Bible is not pieces of information about God and Jesus and whatever else we take and apply to situations as we would a cookbook or an instruction manual.
And while I’m at it, let’s make a group decision to drop once and for all the Bible-as-owner’s-manual metaphor. It’s terrible. It really is.
When was the last time you read the owner’s manual for your toaster? Do you find it remotely inspiring or meaningful?
You only refer to it when something’s wrong with your toaster. You use it to fix the problem, and then you put it away.
We have to embrace the Bible as the wild, uncensored, passionate account it is of people experiencing the living God.
Doubting the one true God.
Wrestling with, arguing with, getting angry with, reconciling with, loving, worshipping, thanking, following the one who gives us everything.
We cannot tame it.
We cannot tone it down.
If we do, then we can’t say it is the life-giving Word of God. We have made it something else.
So when we treat the Bible as if it floats in space, unattached to when and where it actually happened, we are basically saying that God gave us the wrong kind of book. It is a book of ancient narratives. We cannot make it something it is not.31 (#ulink_68feabde-116e-558c-aeec-5c6701f3fbfd)
When Jesus talks about divorce, he is entering into a discussion that was one of the eight great debates of his day.32 (#ulink_86cf8c66-c9da-55eb-a932-b635ecca7ba2) He is interacting with a specific tradition and other rabbis of his day who had said specific things about divorce. The great rabbis Hillel and Shammai had specific yokes in regard to divorce. When Jesus is asked questions about divorce, what he is really being asked is, “Who do you side with, Hillel or Shammai?” People are asking him to enter into the current discussion. And in Jesus’s answer, he sides with one of them.33 (#ulink_8bdc34a2-f5b6-5419-9e6d-218a7c83fac2) To grab a few lines of Jesus and drop them down on someone 2,000 years later without first entering into the world in which they first appeared is lethal to the life and vitality and truth of the Bible.
Real people, in real places, at real times, writing and telling stories about their experiences and their growing understanding of who God is and who they are.
This does not in any way discount the power of reading the Bible with no background knowledge at all, which is why these words are so powerful. We can enter into them at any level and they speak to us. Whether we are reading the Bible for the first time or standing in a field in Israel next to a historian and an archaeologist and a scholar, the Bible meets us where we are. That is what truth does.
For example, the book of Deuteronomy is patterned after treaties that were common in its day. The writer essentially took a common legal document and changed the content and the names but kept the form the same.
The end of the book of Mark is arranged according to the coronation ceremonies of the Roman emperor. Maybe Mark witnessed one of these ceremonies, because he is very intentional about the order of events leading up to Jesus’s death. His readers would have been familiar with these Roman coronation events. They would have read between the lines right away. Mark wants you to see Jesus as a king like Caesar, but at the same time totally unlike Caesar.
The first three miracles in the book of John are directly related to the three major gods of Asia Minor, the region John writes his gospel to. Dionysus was the god who turned water into wine, Asclepius was the god of healing, and Demeter was the goddess of grain. So how does John begin his story? With Jesus turning water into wine, healing, and then feeding thousands of people. John has an agenda. He wants these people in this place and this time to know that Jesus is better than their gods.
When Paul writes to Timothy about women being saved in childbirth, he is making a direct reference to the goddess Artemis, whose temple was just down the street in Timothy’s hometown of Ephesus. Artemis’s followers believed that Artemis saved women from dying in childbirth, which is significant in a city where one out of two women died giving birth. Paul’s statement here has huge political, social, and religious implications. He is implying that Artemis is a fraud.34 (#ulink_efe101dd-c20e-5b86-80b7-b655950ca1e0)
The first chapters of the book of Revelation follow the sequence of events of the Domitian games, held in honor of the caesar who was in power at the time Revelation was written. Domitian would address the leaders of the various provinces, then his choir of twenty-four would sing worship songs to him, and then there would be a horse race. John is writing Revelation to people who had seen the Domitian games; they know exactly what he is referring to. He wants them to see that Domitian is a fake and Jesus is the real King.
The writers of the Bible are communicating in language their world will understand. They are using the symbols and pictures and images of the culture they are speaking to. That’s why the Bible has authority—God has authority and is present in real space and time. The Bible is a collection of stories that teach us about what it looks like when God is at work through actual people. The Bible has the authority it does only because it contains stories about people interacting with the God who has all authority.
The point in the book of Acts isn’t the early church. The point is the God who is at work in and through the early church to change the world.35 (#ulink_43253115-7e7d-5648-a3fb-4d4d5a344ad0) When we take the Bible seriously, we are taking God seriously. We believe that the same God who was at work then is at work now. The same God in the same kinds of ways. The goal is not to be a “New Testament church.” That makes the New Testament church the authority. The authority is God who is acting in and through those people at that time and now these people at this time.
The point is to ask, what is God up to here, now?
What in the world is God doing today?
How should we respond?
How did they respond?
What can we learn from them that will help us now?
This is why binding and loosing is so exhilarating. You can only do it if you believe and see God at work now, here in this place. You are reacting to a God who is alive and well and working and saving and redeeming.
The Bible tells a story. A story that isn’t over. A story that is still being told. A story that we have a part to play in.
Creating and Recognizing
In order to bind and loose, we have to think about inspiration in terms of recognition as well as creation. Here’s what I mean: People sat down and wrote things on paper. Well, sometimes even that came a lot later. Much of the Bible was oral tradition that was circulating for years and years before someone wrote it down.
Picture a campfire thousands of years ago in what is Iraq today. A group of shepherds have gathered at the end of the day; the meal is over and the stories begin to flow, and a young girl says to her uncle, “Tell me again why the world is how it is.”
And her uncle responds: “In the beginning God created . . .”
Back to the writing part. The people who eventually wrote all of this down weren’t sitting there with their hand and the pen moving as if controlled by some outside force.
The writers of the Bible had agendas.
Luke said he wrote to give an orderly account of all that has gone down.
John said he wrote so we will believe in Jesus.
The writer of the book of Ruth had some strong opinions about Jews marrying Gentiles.
The writers obviously took what they were doing very seriously and had specific outcomes they wanted from their writings, but that doesn’t mean they woke up in the morning thinking, Today I’ll write a section of the Bible.
Now, apparently their writings were recognized as inspired soon after their creation. Peter mentions the writings of Paul in one of his letters: “[Paul] writes the same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters. His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the other scriptures, to their own destruction.”36 (#ulink_c474bad8-cb72-5ef8-9d25-cd27d0142af8)
I love that phrase “hard to understand.” The Bible was difficult to grasp on the first pass for people who had written it.
But my point here is that Peter is referring to the writings of Paul in the same light as “the other scriptures.”
Already early in the life of the Jesus movement, certain letters and writings were beginning to distinguish themselves as being different, inspired, “from God” in ways that other religious writings weren’t. For the next several hundred years, there was a lot of discussion in the Christian community about which books were considered scripture and which books weren’t. But it wasn’t until the 300s that what we know as the sixty-six books of the Bible were actually agreed upon as “the Bible.”
This is part of the problem with continually insisting that one of the absolutes of the Christian faith must be a belief that “scripture alone” is our guide. It sounds nice, but it is not true.37 (#ulink_eb53861e-2b9d-581e-8b3d-9d4994c30774) In reaction to abuses by the church, a group of believers during a time called the Reformation claimed that we only need the authority of the Bible. But the problem is that we got the Bible from the church voting on what the Bible even is. So when I affirm the Bible as God’s Word, in the same breath I have to affirm that when those people voted, God was somehow present, guiding them to do what they did. When people say that all we need is the Bible, it is simply not true.
In affirming the Bible as inspired, I have to affirm the Spirit who I believe was inspiring those people to choose those books.38 (#ulink_dd400351-91b7-598b-a353-dd9616c3a990)
Were they binding and loosing the Bible itself?
At some point we have to have faith. Faith that God is capable of guiding people. Faith that God has not left us alone. Faith that the same Spirit who guided Paul and Peter and those people in a room in the 300s is still
with