Kazakhs and Turks

Kazakhs and Turks
Almaz Braev

Kazakhs and Turks are two fraternal peoples belonging to the Turkic world. This book is an attempt to trace how these two peoples passed their way to modernity. What they experienced. What we have achieved. What they can be proud of. I’m sure it will be fascinating for the reader. We have not raised such a topic yet. Although a lot is written about the Turks. How they subjugated all neighbors, created great empires that is a lot of populism in such writing. It is my intended for readers to think

Kazakhs and Turks

Almaz Braev

© Almaz Braev, 2023

ISBN 978-5-0060-3591-1

Создано в интеллектуальной издательской системе Ridero

Chapter 1

Turks and Kazakhs

War must be inevitable and vital. As long as the life of the nation is not in danger, war is murder.

Mustafa Kemal Ataturk

War must be inevitable and vital. As long as the life of the nation is not in danger, war is murder.

Mustafa Kemal Ataturk

The Zerefs are the first, the most massive group of self reflection. These are warriors, ordinary people, workers and philistines. From a historical perspective, the self- reflection of Zeref means warriors, members of a tribal collective, where each Zeref, if necessary, is a warrior, alien to another Zeref from another tribe. I would not say that modern nationalists use the rudiments of the primitive culture of warriors. After modernization, people with zeref reflection can be found anywhere in the civilized world. In a crisis, even the intelligentsia – the gold of the nation – the Remids turn into savages out of anger and resentment against other savages and barbarians. It is this fallen intelligentsia that forms the idea of fascism. The Zerefs self are not capable of forming thought-forms, except for actions, for them the Nazi ideology is formed by feral, embittered Remids, but mostly the officers of the SS and blackshirts detachments are the Zeremids – children of the rural intelligentsia. In general, after modernization in the 20th and 21st centuries, the most rude people, philistines, people with low tastes and needs are Zerefs. It is the Zerefs who are biased and proud when they use the main tones of the Zerefs. Zerefs conventionally have two colors, two shades, a lot of sounds to express emotions, two sides and two sensations – good and evil. Evil and good they feel and understand as satiety and prosperity today only of their family, and in the past – prosperity and satiety only of their kind, clan, tribe and people. They say either yes or no but at the same time, they always look at the age of a person when answering. All traditional peoples have a very good quality, they respect and take care of old people.

The Zerefs understand the idea well as a pleasant emotion, because they draw satiety and prosperity, prosperity again as a minimum of family, a maximum for people. The idealism of the masses ends when the people do not receive the promised, for example, in the form of communism, as happened with the Zerefs of the USSR or at the time of democracy – this is already a common example of the birth of Nazism and fascism. The leader of the Zerefs must necessarily be a strong leader, because the Zerefs are ideological, they must know that they will receive democracy or communism. Communism and democracy are interpreted by the Zerefs not as equality, although the equality of the Zerefs is always welcomed, but the lands or trophies that the Zerefs are plucking. In democracy, the Zerefs like the first place. Or any honorable new place, because it is democracy that creates the illusion of a new, necessarily honorable place. In any idea, the Zerefs want to leave the social bottom that they occupy in the previous formation, in the old world, in the last state. Yes, Zerefs after modernization are a crowd of philistines. It will welcome democracy precisely because of mass opportunity. The conditional bottom is excited that all bottom creatures will float to the surface and will live there. But unfortunately for the Zerefs, they are creating a hierarchy again – with a new bottom and new top gold, with the new elite and the despicable rabble. A strong leader reduces the activity, or rather the greed of the Zerefs, teaches the Zerefs to work and responsibility. If the Zerefs do not have a dictator, the Zerefs will resort to the old habit of fighting for a new place of honor.

Chapter 2

When empires fall, the mob gets stupid

Nothing demoralizes the people like defeat. We must pay tribute to the Ottoman Empire it lasted almost as long as the Tokugawa Shogunate in Japan. Apparently, the Japanese shogun suffered because of the close proximity of the events. The Americans in 1858 showed the traditional tactlessness – a warning salvo from the most modern guns took place in the Japanese port. All people instantly turned from Japanese Bakufu giants into Japanese barakumin dwarfs, unable to defend the islands. As for the Turks, the most serious defeat was inflicted on the Turks near Vienna in 1683. But, as it was said, it took another two centuries for the empire to turn into a republic. For the Ottoman Empire to collapse, it took the defeat of Turkey as part of the Triple Alliance. Even the capture of Bayazed by Timur in 1402 or the defeat at Lepanto in 1571 from the Holy Alliance did not affect the fate of the Turks in any way. Because everything in the old days was decided by the Turkish nobility. The Turks empire held out for two more centuries. When the people decide, the empire falls faster.

(Nobody knows about this phenomenon yet but my readers will be the first to know. To begin with, knowledge is the privilege of priests. If information comes first today because dependence on momentary knowledge has turned into a global drug addiction. People, modern humanity, have changed knowledge for news. News is also knowledge, but information does not give full power. The power over the world is given by systemic knowledge, they are just part of the system of control over humanity. Humanity is given superficial knowledge so that people feel like Egyptian priests for a few minutes. But a crowd cannot consist of only priests – intellectuals, a crowd is a crowd, rabble, arrogant bloggers of social networks. It is on the total pride of the crowd that the calculation is made. Democracy adds to the total stupidity even more stupidity that all people allegedly are priests. Namely, that all people allegedly are artists, artists, writers, bloggers. But all people cannot be beautiful. So all people can’t be writers. Why are they given the opportunity? So that, having received information, people feel like «personalities» and kill real natural sages inside their world. For billions of people, «cattle» are got lost about self of this by the very rulers whom the most cynical writers call the 300 Committee – the world government. «Whoever owns the information owns the world.» Has everyone read this expression? Well, of course. If the head of the US Congress Nancy Pelosi finds out where the Americans’ funds will be directed, her husband will buy shares of enterprises in these industries. The Pelosi family will become very rich. Information is not knowledge. If people are allowed to look only at the tip of the iceberg, they will rejoice at the pieces of ice on the deck of the Titanic in the first minutes of the tragedy. Therefore, people were drummed into all ears from all sides about the fantastic killer virus. Before the planetary scam came to light, a dozen of my opponents called me an imbecile and with a Dunning – Kruger symptom. This is just an indicator of pride from some upstarts and bloggers planted by the diabolical media on the deck of well-fed, self-satisfied idiots, hysterics and others from the rabble squad.

Chapter 3

What is the reason for the war

When two zerefs look at each other, everyone knows who is the first, who is the second. Even the relatives of the brothers with a difference of a few minutes should replenish the formation of conservative soldiers. The society of tradition spends the least time on peeping and looking, even in a crowd, when hundreds of eyes are looking at you, they already know a lot. This gazing is delayed for a longer period. If some mentors, teachers, curators come to the people of the tradition and inform them, you are not any brothers, you are not a people, you are market individuals. Then even the twins begin to argue who personality is more important who have ten minutes more, after a while the whole nation starts a fight, which teachers, mentors, curators call democratic reforms.

In fact, democracy cancels not only seniority and zerefs are getting younger, they don’t want to give in, they don’t want to die. The whole crowd is getting younger, even the elderly are ready to give way to the young to the next world – they wear fashionable clothes so that they are not recognized now, drink filtered water so that there are no kidney stones. Teenagers brats approach the young men, address them like this: «Bro, let me smoke!» Disguised and trimmed «for democracy» old bros are a little embarrassed, but they give (and who is greedy, says that there is no cigar). Suddenly, everyone’s age disappears. That’s what democracy is when the devils come to the twins. It is impossible to prevent the Zerefs from considering each other. At any age, when Zeref looks at you, he knows where to stand: behind you or in front of you. And old age is not the only conservative marker. Although democratic zerefs from now on are always trying to deceive others, themselves, and time. People tell each other: «You’re still young, you’re still so young.» But it’s not because of democracy. These are still remnants of the conservative tact that remains with traditional people despite the devil’s propaganda.

"Good times give birth to weak people. Weak people breed difficult times."

These words of the ancient Greek Plato explain well why devils -neighbors come to the Zerefs. Why a conservative society is suddenly engaged in reformation. It seems that everyone walked in a general formation, obeyed informal laws. Now everyone’s gaze began to money. No one moves without a kick. They need a mate, obscenity, then a kick. Are the traditional people are lazy creatures? The first reaction to reforms is always a reaction. In any country, under any conservative regime, there is a part of the ruling elite, the so-called old men, clerics, who cannot be considered because of conscious blindness, because of laziness. The rabble and the common people cannot simultaneously replace the cream of society. The day comes, the hour comes when respected people are escorted to the next world with appropriate honors. And none of the high ranks intends to cancel this tradition.

But the fact is that the long absence of war delays all procedures.

There is always a whole queue of honorary veterans at the central churchyard. People were used to burying their traditional elite. Funerals change funerals. There are monuments on the main square of the country. Thieves and crooks have already settled comfortably among the crowd to gawk now.

The season of the «long world» also greatly influences the local evolution. A long peace softens morals of Zerefs. Cunning people, cowards, crooks, people from the Diaspora enjoy silence and funeral almost daily marches. The season of peace gives such an opportunity to penetrate into all spheres, because zerefs lose their vigilance, stop watching, do not look too closely. Requirements are reduced. The season of the long peace, it’s certainly very good for the cunning and weak people. When those most difficult times come after the good ones, people just like to remember them: when they had the kindest ruler (for example, Soviet people remember General Secretary Brezhnev – the kindest and incompetent puppet), after him came frankly vague. A conservative world must end in war. No one asks themselves questions, but how did these difficult times come? At this time, too many «twins» are born to go to war (because boys are born warriors here, they have to go to war. But now there is no such war).

Now I explain: all the cunning, crooks, hypocrites, thieves – the elite of liberal reformers just got into all spheres because of the lazy gaze of dying old men and the grave mood inside the funeral procession. «Good times breed weak people.» Good times have many traits. But the most important feature of officials of good times is their beauty – kindness. The leaders may be nondescript, but the ruling nomenclature is selected by outwardly pleasant, sympathetic Komsomol members, singers, cosmonauts, central television announcers. The ancient Greeks, Plato’s contemporaries, were just betting on physical perfection, the beauty of the body before ancient Greece lost. With decaying socialism, they relied only on the face, on the artists. In good times, all the artists are beautiful (in bad times, all the characters, on the contrary, are ugly, resemble freaks) No one looked closely at these artists, because there were good times – these are the times of artists and hypocrites – weak people, future traitors, philistines, defectors but the population was fine. There was no one to envy. Conservative people begin to envy and interfere with each other when order is violated, including the traditional funeral procession. The reformers who come to the twins to wean them off keeping the queue don’t come just like that. In order for worms to appear, the soil must be dewatered.

In the Ottoman Empire in 1809, Mahmud 2 – the Turkish Peter 1 ascended to the throne. In this pair, Russia was the first to carry out reforms. Turkish soldiers lost to the Russia in 1806 – 1829. Precisely because Mahmoud 2 was surrounded by elite old reactionaries, clerics. But the vizier Alemdar Mustafa Pasha Bayraktar helped him to ascend to the throne. Without Bayraktar, Mahmoud would not have succeeded at all.

But the liberal reforms of Mahmud 2 – Tanzimat – were just a copy of Peter's reforms. Mahmud 2 dressed the whole yard in European clothes. The main reforms concerned the rearmament of the army. Mahmud abolished the janissaries, abolished the sipahia – the Turkish oprichnina – the old land system for military service – replaced it with private property (ciftlik).

Yes, conservatives are going for reforms, primarily military ones. Civil reforms are secondary for them. This applies to everyone without exception. It is before the turmoil that the "beautiful" civilian population begins to listen to the military, because by this time all civilians are hypocrites, crooks, thieves or potential crooks, thieves are the very products of a long peace.

The reforms that the most energetic people are trying to carry out are designed to replace the real war, while it has not yet taken place, with military mobilization. Therefore, all the Young Turks reformers, Egyptian "free officers", Iraqi, Libyan, South American black colonels are all products of liberal military reformism. All monarchs are reformers, including Turkish Selim 3, Mahmoud 2, Libyan Idris 1 or even the father of the last Iranian Shah Reza Pahlavi were reformers. They trained only the military for capture or for the protection of their satrapies. But in order for the people to have Mustafa Kemal, Lenin or Hitler, it was the war that had to take place.

Yes, war has an ugly face. But it is the war that the crowds are preparing, hundreds of pretty handsome men who are admired by millions of inhabitants of the «good season». In a peaceful period of time, zealots, strong figures like Mustafa Kemal cannot break through to the top in any way. Because mass ignorance, jealousy, therefore fear and envy allow people to enjoy good rulers. In turn, good rulers think not about honor, but about memory, about huge mazars and pyramids that will remind of that good time when it was they who ruled.

Chapter 4

Now everything is bought and sold

Since Modern times, the very method of developing new territories has changed. After the usual robber seizure of new territories, the conquistadors, pirates, (even nomads) were followed all the time by unarmed people. They would have carried weapons, but they were forbidden to carry weapons. These unarmed people have done no less, and maybe more, for the development of new lands. They would have used weapons, they even did it when they became «citizens» after the revolutions, but they mastered a different weapon. I don’t mean religious missionaries. Go to any market where, without any violence, by mutual consent, that is, completely voluntarily, you will give your money for some thing. Any mini market «resident» will show you how all the new invaders acted before him in a visual way.

So, all modern states were created on the basis of a strategic treaty. This is not an elite contract, because before everything was kept on the balance of the aristocracy. The bourgeoisie, and we are talking about them when we mention the unarmed diplomats who seized this world – modern states have taken shape at the expense of world trade. And the alliance was made up of small people, completely small and insignificant from a position of strength, they are also small bourgeois – there have always been a lot of them, now they are the main planetary contingent. Without the strategic partnership of the «petty nobodies», not a single seizure of Indians, Africans, Asians and other savage territories in the opinion of these racists and chauvinists would have taken place. The whole of Asia is still trying to establish strategic alliances with the market nobodies, but nothing is working for the modern Asian elites (With the exception, perhaps, of Japan. But democracy for Japan is the path to annihilation, because it was through democracy that Japan lost the samurai spirit). All these elites, falling into bondage with the 7th-8th generation of bourgeois nobodies, begin to declare «commitment to democratic choice.» Of course, it is possible to convict these elites of their own plebeianism, because many Asian elites took place thanks to socialist revolutions (which were not invented by Asians at all. Socialism has raised the social bottom to a height, moreover. The children of the «working people» who «amazingly» turned out to be ungrateful – they abandoned socialism, that is, they betrayed socialism when they achieved power and money.

Chapter 5

Kazakh Bolivar

Why is there a discrepancy between Asians and democracy?

The word bourgeoisie in Asia is completely inappropriate in the common sense of usage, as this word is used all over the world, because the bourgeoisie got its name in London and Paris, and not in Nanjing or Dhaka. No one has ever thought about equality in a strictly class environment, especially with the elite. So it was in Egypt since the time of the Pharaohs, so it was everywhere where the landed aristocracy was noticed (the landed aristocracy was everywhere) For example, in Japan, the bourgeoisie was the most despicable class until the Meiji era. The aristocrats of Japan themselves raised the start of their peddlers of nonentities for guidance, so that they were motivated: "if these nonentities won in Europe, maybe we will be lucky" (in the same spirit, Kazakhs call children by the names of other peoples to deceive the spirits. Japanese and Kazakhs are very similar in animism) They copied the West fanatically, because they copied some incomprehensible force. Before Japan, Europeans colonized all of Asia. Where did they get their power from? That's what the frightened Japanese were interested in.

In Asia, everything was decided and decided by the elite – I ask everyone to remember this. Allied detachments opposed to some third force were considered partners. Another partnership is not possible. The strategic alliance extends only to blood ties through dynastic marriages (modern marriages of children of Kazakh officials and oligarchs are proof of this. We are Kazakhs, «yes, we are Scythians…", we wanted to sneeze at the modernization of Russians and Communists. Self reflection cannot be deceived). Only a strategic partnership at the blood level, so that if you glue the two tops together, you get a horde against a third party. This can explain the fragility of the so-called states of the same nomads as in the past so now. Why nomads? Yes, because the nomads have full ambitions until now. (We are belligerent, close in energy to the Highlanders, northern Indians). Yes, because the nomadic states, like the medieval feudal lords of Europe, had a fluidity: there was a specific leader, a bright leader (an outstanding personality – in different places with different common names). As a tribute, his colleagues tried to support his sons, and the sons tried to continue their father’s work – little turned out. Somewhere the hereditary system was preserved, monarchical dynasties appeared, somewhere the sons could do nothing. Attila’s empire collapsed immediately after the death of its founder – because Attila’s sons quarreled and fought. A barbaric partnership is impossible without subordination, without hierarchy. «Bolivar can’t stand two..» If two candidates appear, even several – this is an emergency. It follows from this: barbaric, pagan, feudal-monarchical, Asian-traditional partnership is possible only at the top among the elite. And this is not a partnership at all, but subordinated in a rigid hierarchy of its members. Nomadic so-called states cannot be called states in the European sense of the word. All the settled peoples of the so – called farmers could cooperate at the lowest level, the cooperation of the peasants went beyond one family – from the cultivation of the field to the cooperation of the whole people in the battles for harvests. Of course, there is still a Cosa Nostra in Sicily, and a Camorra in Naples as an indicator of family life. However, this is the south, the proximity of clan Africa also affected. Italy is an exception. Italy – until then was European Asia, ito informally. Accept at least a thousand laws in Asia, where clan «legislation» rules, these official laws will not work. Attempts by nomads to imitate China with the involvement of Chinese officials was not work. Only in the khan’s bet it worked. (Kazakhs, too, are mostly guided by the informal laws of tradition, only the market element has involved all sorts of lawyers, lawyers and other rascals in this matter). Now I want to ask the most honest descendants of the steppe people: what kind of state can there be if the people are guided not by khan’s laws, but by informal law. If people ignore the laws invented by the bourgeoisie in the name of bourgeois property. Kazakhs have never had property in the European sense of property. Kazakhs had everything in common, at least it was considered common, even after the property distinction. What kind of states did the nomads have, all the nomads, even the blue Turks. It was a horde where the elite spread their power to keep everyone, or to show that these people were protected. Kazakhs are still not ready for a strategic partnership, except for the same blood unions – dynastic marriages of the elite. A beggar Kazakh always will imitate a rich Kazakh – a strange thing. To conditionally group the beggars, they must turn into an elite. Having become rich, they will be grouped only by dynastic unions, having outlived their elite children. That’s where the Kazakh «state» actually lives. In order for the Kazakh to group with the Kazakh on an ideological basis, it is necessary for a million Kazakhs to migrate sharply from villages to cities and meet market laws there in all the cynicism of their non-necessity and mockery. Corruption is a mockery not only of officials over the European tracing paper of the state in the form of a union of trading, very greedy nobodies with low taste and needs, accompanying these people throughout history. The Union of Kazakh Nationalists is a very interesting, one might say a rattling union of the impossible. People who are incapable of strategic partnership due to personal ambitions and cultural individualism should unite sometime (in theory), although no one has seen this union yet. «Bolivar can’t take two.» Therefore, a nationalist party is never possible because of an unclear leadership criterion. Only in the form of force majeure, for a short period of the eruption of Mount Fuji when the enemy of my enemy is my friend and the prey is close and everyone sees it. No strategic partnership in Asia is possible, until today. Do not look at the declarations of Asian elites. Even Chinese Communists have their own party nobility. But the Han Chinese are not nomads. Moreover, the nomads are always scattered, they call natural separatism freedom. Such people are ready to break any association, especially the state, because of immanent anarchy.

Chapter 6

Where did the Kazakhs bourgeois come from

There are objective practices for the emergence of the bourgeoisie.

Conservative communities do not welcome the movement. The bourgeoisie appeared just from the movement of superfluous people because in every traditional family, ten children are born. Not necessarily every tenth of a litter of many children, – having many children as a condition, as a guarantee of escape of folk: many descendants of the bourgeois appeared in the cities from landlessness, that is, from poverty.

In order for people to understand the need for cooperation, they had to live in a peasant community themselves. Both in rural areas and in cities, cooperation was a guarantee of survival. So in Europe, workshops appeared in medieval cities. Why couldn't Kazakhs create workshops?

Who among the Kazakhs in general could be the first to turn into the bourgeoisie, given that the Kazakhs did not like money. Like all peoples of the tradition, the Kazakhs loved glory. That’s just out of love for status and contempt for the worthless, however, this feeling is familiar to the whole world, all peoples, Kazakhs appeared candidates for the bourgeoisie according to the Western type of maturation. If we take into account that the nomads did not like cities where strategic cooperation of the Kazakhs could take place. We need to find the reason the Kazakh cooperation without relation to the main Kazakh attribute – belonging to the Kazakh clan (ru). Poverty and rootlessness are the two main bourgeois assets. All the beggars and the rootless want to become famous, so that they are still respected it is fact.

If we remove the upper cooperation (in the revcon, this is called the upper dubbing, when the elite of the people is duplicated by another elite, necessary for the creation of a bourgeois class. Without the solidarity of former beggars who have turned into oligarchs, no modernization is possible. To create an industry, it is not at all a nomadic, not other primitive and feudal elite that is needed. All this traditional old elite should disappear. As practice shows, the primitive elite is destroyed by the new people themselves «in the name of progress». None of these people will change old habits. I’m talking about the personal egoism of the feudal elite, about reforms – changing the stereotype of the behavior of the whole people is out of the question. In order for new people to appear, a crowd of rootless people must appear when people do not remember their relatives. If people remember about pas kind, only external intervention is possible – this is an external double of self reflection, when representatives of other peoples act as teachers), or you can immediately get into the prosak. Yes, these reform teachers are destroying the selfish feudal elite in the name of progress. The versions that the primitive elites themselves will go to voluntary poverty in order to turn into the bourgeoisie seem to be seditious devilry, market demagogy. Japanese samurai would never agree to trade in order to retain power. Those who claim that the Kazakh primitive elite would have shown miracles of selflessness in the name of the people, would have led reforms, that is, ruined themselves and butchered themselves to the head in order to look like beggars, for this the people themselves had to take place, that is, a crowd of rootless scoundrels demanding for self a couple of hundred sheep from them. The bourgeoisie is formed from dirt and shit. From dirt, from conservative shit! This dirt and shit should be eaten by all future oligarchs, as the most unscrupulous people for tradition.