Orange vs Brown. Fascism

Orange vs. Brown. Fascisms
Almaz Braev

The old type of empire opposed the empire of financiers, and stand against the new planetary fascism. But it does so that the citizens themselves infected with the philosophy of money, singly and with the whole mass, would not run over to the enemy’s side. This form of the old species alone is not enough for resistance: this form feeds on old juices, from which the old lesion grows. Money, like internal parasites, eats up all the insides – without a body, an aura cannot appear

Orange vs. Brown

Fascisms

Almaz Braev

© Almaz Braev, 2023

ISBN 978-5-0059-5243-1

Created with Ridero smart publishing system

Chapter 1

Why Nazism and fascism?

Nazism is the most understandable and convenient defense. Hundreds of thousands of people find themselves in the unfriendly environment of modern megacities, where no one needs them. Therefore, they are forced to unite, even conditionally disliking and despising each other. And who loves whom in a modern city? Citizens poisoned by consumer psychology live in a modern city. These citizens compete for a prestigious place, for profit, and for money. They don’t need anyone. They get married for image, have children for appearance, and often get divorced; they don’t need anyone. The urban environment itself is a factory of egoists. In fact, the psychology of urban loners harmonizes with the liberal canons of freedom. While people do not know what freedom really is. All previous theories taught that freedom is independence from tsars, feudal lords, imperialists, occupiers, etc. The enemies of freedom came and took away products, then minerals, and forced them to speak the occupiers’ language. But at first, the monarchy and its vassals did not recognize ordinary people as people. That’s what freedom is; that’s what it was when there were no monarchs and occupiers.

In fact, freedom is not stereotypical freedom imposed by old American stencils. Freedom is not at all what millions of dummies buying a company are babbling about.

In fact, freedom is when you don't have a family and children. That's what true absolute freedom is! Yes, absolute solitude is freedom.

Everyone thinks freedom begins with overthrowing the monarchy, just as the ancient Greeks thought when they overthrew the tyrant. In Europe, monarchs have been overthrown on the «Greek» principle. Now, on the periphery, too, imitating the experience of all revolutionaries, they overthrow some dictator. After that, when they overthrow, these fools do not feel freedom for some reason. At first, there was absolute anarchy. History recorded mass pogroms, chaos, as well as a civil war between everyone, festivities, theft, and total corruption, even worse than during the reign of the tyrant and his vassals. Then a new dictator came. Everyone forgot, and why then overthrew the old dictator? But freedom remained!

Let's look in order.

Hungry peasants from large traditional families fled to the cities. We've already said that. They always remembered where they had escaped from because not much time had passed since their escape, even if they took dirty work: they were hired at the bazaar as porters, were domestic servants, and even engaged in prostitution all their lives. Nothing has changed so far. Until now, people are fleeing from destroyed villages, backward farms, auls. Today, migrants find themselves in the same situation; only modern migrants are not so dirty, they are well-dressed, and the streets of cities are not so scary; on the contrary, these streets are beautiful and bright. They also want to live beautifully. So much worse for migrants.

In the same way, all future Nazis of fascist Germany wanted to live beautifully. Everyone who escapes to cities hates cities and arrogant citizens in the first place. All the townspeople do not behave quite like the really common people. To make the base of Nazism clear, it seems to all migrants that not only do they live in the city not like in the village, but they also speak not like on a farm. If «strangers» not only «live not according to conscience», and speak another language, but also people of another ethnicity and another religion, then woe to «strangers». The separation of the hostile core occurs sequentially. Migrants need an enemy to calm themselves down. The fact of widespread migration is not enough to understand the nature of Nazism. The basis of fascism is in monoculture, ancestral religion, in the search for relatives, that is, in kindred feelings and blood. The most important thing that distinguishes all traditional peoples is stratification and hierarchy. An army of migrants invades cities, sees a semi-feudal city laid out on shelves and professions, migrants look at each other and find a universal weapon against all citizens. Religion and culture recede into the background for the army of the future of Nazism. They are all squeezed by their status. That's why they start talking more than shouting. Whoever does not speak like them is their enemy.

(If millions of peasants had not fled to the cities during collectivization, Stalin would not have been able to organize his Moscow trials. The radicalism of the class struggle persisted in Bolshevism. Stalin pointed his finger at the elite, the red intelligentsia, and the generals, who were doomed. But how so? You may ask, where is the innate peasant nationalism here? After all, all the peasants who run away from the village, and today all the provincials, are innate nationalists. Yes, it is. But Bolshevism violated the old hierarchy, exterminated, and expelled the nobility – the objects of hatred. Therefore, the provincials could meet the same former peasants in Soviet cities. These fresh townspeople still went home to the village to visit. They spoke the same language and wore almost the same poor clothes. Only the red bosses stood out against this background. All those destroyed by Stalin were cultured and literate. Pol Pot also used hatred of «scientists» in Kampuchea. All traditional peoples are brought up in a hierarchy. Therefore, any coup among such people will accompany mass violence when changing roles. In addition, without influencing the mood of migrant peasants in the form of Marxism, as happened in Russia, Nazism is inevitable. Nazism is a natural evolution of suffering and grief not necessarily material. The peasant mass meets hostile people, not relatives at all. If such a meeting had taken place in a village or a village, the strangers would have been beaten. Nazism, the so-called fascism, is the beating of strangers in the city.

The fascist leaders knew their people well because all these leaders themselves were evil, ambitious provincials. However, all bright Nazis are evil, ambitious provincials. The paternal cultural core, the father—leader, the elder brothers, and the people of their farm are closer, and it turns among related provincials into slogans uber ales – your people, your nation are the best. Your mom is the best, and your dad is the best, it turns into a superior over other Untermensch. This old tribal slogan seems childish to us today. But don't we consider primitive people such as cute savages from distant centuries? In fact, the childish, virgin world, recycled and turned into a Nazi one, works well and inspires. If you repeat and drum superiority into young people for several years, a whole army of aggressive young people appears.

So.

For a new Führer to appear, broad migration and cities populated by «outsiders» are needed to remove migrant complexes.

But all over again.

For a Nazi to appear, he must see a liberal.

And a real liberal has no relatives and horses. Liberals and Democrats can be only those who do not remember the names of their great-grandfathers, who have no connection with their small homeland for at least one generation, as well as all sorts of different bachelors and other old maidens. Bachelors and spinsters are the highest standards according to the liberal canons of freedom because they don’t owe anyone, they have no family, and no children.

Chapter 2

Old fascism and hybrid fascism

Despite the presence of a charismatic leader, fascism means a collective dictatorship. Like Roman Caesar, such a leader appeals to every member of the Reich. The fate of the nation depends on everyone! Instead of representatives of noble families, the state bureaucracy rules in the Reich. The parties of the Roman dictators – Sulla, Maria, Caesar, and even the rebel Katelina could easily call themselves fascist. But after modern, the ancient aristocracy degraded and withdrew from the scene (although the European aristocrats who survived are still credited with a secret {suggestion} influence on modern politics). Ideological statesmen patriots replaced the arrogant aristocracy, originating from the urban lower classes, and their leaders were born in the province (As the son of provincial teacher Benito Mussolini).

It could not be otherwise. The market degradation of morals and morals causes rejection and disgust, especially among the province's inhabitants. It was in the province that the leaders of nationalism could be born. And the process of maturing nationalism will manifest itself among the former peasants, even if they managed to be citizens for a while. It is dissatisfaction with humiliation coupled with the so-called human rights rooted even in the province because the traditional people (Zerefs) perceive everything at face value. At the same time, all the townspeople have long learned to lie totally, giving rise to fascism. In this sense, fascism owes post-modernism for its total lies. Market competition has left no place for moral truth because an honest path is always a long way to success (while a lie shows a universal rejection, in fact, not of truth, but of tradition: truth is only a part, albeit the main, of traditional morality). Fascism could not but lead to the total lie of civilized citizens and added provincial aggression to the lie because it is the peasants, embittered by crop failure and need, who are extremely aggressive; it is in the peasant nature that aggression is always present. Lies and aggression, combined, then turn into the ideology of superiority among the fascists. It is the peasants who are the suppliers of unnatural superiority. Because this super artificial superiority always lies in the almost childish protest of all the lower classes; otherwise, these inside-out complexes cannot be called. To see fascism, you must first see a strange, poorly dressed, and therefore sullen crowd. Does this crowd remind you of someone? If you have poor relatives, then you will find out that they are ashamed of their irreverence among all the other guests invited to the wedding. All the provincial Zerefs resemble these most humiliated, killed by their complexes under the oblique glances of relatives. All the provincials also hate the townspeople, considering them too cultured parasites. Currently, in crisis, every ruler must do something to occupy this gloomy crowd, and of course, war is the best means of distracting the provincials.

To see the evolution of fascist affairs and fascist history, you must understand that the modern crowd will not be pushed into the world slaughter just like in the 20th century. But the traditional large number of European rural families gave the rulers a whole army of soldiers. Throughout the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Europe was sick of nationalism. Although the proletarians also appeared together with their ideologue, Karl Marx. The workers' internationalism could not oppose anything to petty-bourgeois nationalism or ignorant and aggressive peasants who had been looking for the guilty all their medieval history. We have already heard about the unfortunate women sentenced to death by the mob for crop failures. The merchants and bureaucrats of the government learned how to manage popular aggression and did not suspect they were actually managing the tradition or habits of all the Zerefs. Why is fascism aggressive? We also told you about it. He would never have been so aggressive if he had not fed on the primeval juices of humanity. Although, at the same time, the militarization of provincial complexes, and the anger of the provincials, propagandists emphasized that this was a battle in the state's interests.

I apologize for such a long introduction. For fascism, one crisis is not enough; an army of complex provincials is needed. The traditional nations with many children could give such an army of soldiers. (Modern Europe is completely unsuitable for the old fascism of the 20th century because Europeans have almost no children; migrants give birth to them.  These people have known private property and consumption for many generations and have been living in a world of illusions for a long time like drug addicts: they think the bread rolls grow on trees, and sausage itself crawls into the supermarket window. The world of Europe is a world of potential drug addicts. Only the most marginalized people use drugs in Europe; in fact, the whole of Europe is ready for illusions. The slightest worries cause stress in Europeans. Living in comfort and abundance has created requests and needless family psychologists. When the Europeans were shown pictures of the scam in Bucha, the Europeans fell into a trance. Like children, Europeans were ready to receive vaccines several times a year. Teenagers cry when they are shown violence on screens. The modern new fascism is well aware of this)

So. The old fascism is refracting provincial mass complexes into nationalist aggression. If the population is sufficiently urbanized, there are few children in families; in this case, the old fascism is impossible. The old fascism has no people from whom to assemble an army to attack. For the old fascism, the mere presence of an army of unemployed is not enough. The old fascism needed a crowd of humiliated intellectuals to simulate national superiority. It is the national intelligentsia that invents the myth of superiority. Complexed provincials at this time are languishing from complexes and are ready to just beat anyone. Humiliated by poverty, the Remids indicate to the Zerefs the direction in which direction to run to punish inferior peoples. Fascism needs a great history of the people to have words for its anthem and bricks for its big building.

There is hybrid fascism.

When there is a crowd of unemployed provincials, there is a crowd of calculating intellectuals, there are market temptations, pictures of the beautiful life of oligarchs and corrupt officials, and at the same time, there is no great story. Only in the mode of total surrounding lies of post-modernity, when there is no time for truth and tradition, when noble and honest people cause laughter, as the righteous would cause ridicule among the inhabitants of Sodom and Gamorra, a hybrid option is possible. It is still a traditional society, radicalized in a short time by the moral decay of the state and the elite. These are not savages from the islands and not naive Indians of the time of Columbus, and these are people after modernization which totally literate. After modernization, people understand everything. They are educated. All the events taking place are evaluated well. They consciously choose the side of lies and consciously lie because of market competition to reach the finish line – to success, to wealth among winners. But the temptations are before their eyes! Life inspires them that everything around them is a lottery. Everyone is not lucky. (In Europe, aggressive National Socialism originated in a Protestant environment. Catholic Italy remained within its territory. A strong tradition behaves differently when colliding with the market. Any fundamental tradition does not welcome lies. Conservative circles and the aristocracy rejected barbarism. If there is no aristocracy but a village tradition, in this case, the Maidan cannot be avoided. Russian Orthodoxy does not welcome happiness falling on its head through a lottery of luck. Therefore, exclusively liberal bohemians, oligarchs, artists, singers, and showmen in Russia fell ill with pacifism almost instantly, like European parliamentarians. Show business persons in Russia portrayed that they were also used to luxury and, as Europeans, had never seen violence in their life. Although, in fact, these people are all provincial, they did not want to lose their money because of sanctions; that is, they are ordinary hypocrites)

Chapter 3

Different fascisms and different communisms

Fascism as a system emerged in the first quarter of the 20th century. The history of communism, and its principles, are more ancient. Even European scientific communism is a hundred years older than fascism in the sense of involving the ruling regime of the masses of the petty bourgeoisie in its goals.

Fascism differs from previous empires in patriotism. The inferiority complex of the petty bourgeoisie under the old fascism is maintained by the regime and turns into a means, into a battering ram, to the imperial seizures. It is inconceivable that any aristocracy would seek an alliance with the lower classes, with the rabble. Fascism pushed aside the internal caste hierarchy and moved it outside – to external aggression because people from the beginning of human history want to organize and dominate (since the time of monkeys to show superiority).

That is, the old fascism, aka fascism of the 20th century, is organized nationalism, (there was no nationalism before that). So fascism is organized nationalism. Ethnically, there have been skirmishes at all times, but only an organized market has simultaneously organized ethnic groups that have now become nations – armies against other nations and subhumans.

It so happened that the old fascism was formed later than the official Russian communism.

Russian Revolution of 1917. The Russian world did not have enough development – capitalism and organization. Russian peasants lived in the village as a community. But there was no cult of money in Russian culture. From this, the bourgeois nation was replaced by a new type of Russian community. The Russian nobility did not see the need to organize the bourgeoisie on the principles of superiority for them the feudal hierarchy was enough. The Russian bourgeoisie did not have the power and influence that bankers and stockbrokers had in Europe. To a lack of money (and the power of money over people’s minds), Russian capitalism organized itself into a proletarian dictatorship at the first crisis. Thus, Marxism helped the Russian elite embody the patriarchal hierarchy as innate, inherent in humanity, into the dictatorship of the workers.

There is such a difference between fascism and communism in the 20th century. The fascist elite rallied the nation, realized the idea of superiority, and deployed the bourgeoisie outside. The communist elite in Moscow transformed the Russian community into a dictatorship of the proletarian lower classes over any aristocracy, that is, inside the community.

The Russian elite would not have enough bourgeois contagion and energy to push its plebs to conquer the world. But Karl Marx’s scientific communism helped preserve the Russian Empire (after under the name of the USSR). Greed is the main feeling that allowed Europe to abandon Marxism – communism: most Europeans have fled from their villages and forgotten the community and kinship. Greed is a feeling familiar to every trader in general. In the traditional world, the opposite money did not have that power and authority therefore, socialism was the only way to develop conventional people in the 20th century.

In the 20th century, the world was divided into two camps – NATO and the Warsaw Pact. There were many Third World countries else that had not yet joined them. In these countries, there was no power of banks, and no elite for Marxism was formed, that is, the tradition was more substantial than both money and passion. Former peasants could not contradict their feudal lords. In any case, any top management of the Third World learned in one direction or another or pretended because the world was coming together technologically. The socialist system was closer to traditional peoples, at the same time, each local elite did not want to give everything to the people. This is how hybrid regimes of the «third way» turned out – in the form of a combination of the market, which inevitably led to the power of local bankers and regular coups of black colonels against them as it was in Latin America, or as it was happening in the Middle East and North Africa where Arab officers all the time proclaimed the «people’s system». In fact, these countries lacked Zeremids like in Russia to create a planned economy, or Refags men to create a coherent banking system and abandon traditional culture and communism.

In this form, the whole world has crawled into the 21st century.

Due to globalization and the dominance of money, a new fascism began to raise its head. But this fascism is completely non-national, as fascism was in the 20th century. This fascism of the global bank, that is, non-national. There was a subordination of all countries and governments to a single currency, where national banks, so their governments turned out to be branches of the World Bank. All the countries of the world turned out to be vassals of the world government. De jure they are independent and with «human rights», de facto, any country, its leader that does not obey the world plan, falls under sanctions. At first, the most perfect outcasts like Cuba, North Korea, and Iran fell under sanctions in the form of a test of strength and influence. Now Russia falls under Western sanctions, its government behaved like an arrogant Third World elite in the 20th century.

In the 20th century, communism beat fascism.

But what kind of communism was it?

It was rural communism because of the so-called dictatorship of the proletariat. The proletariat is the former peasants disguised in working clothes. With the help of a new discipline and dictatorship, the Soviet government redirected the rebellious energy of the people into creation. But first, it allowed to kill the old feudal, then the new revolutionary Lenin’s guard elite. This is the same fascist chthonic energy as that of the European petty bourgeoisie. But this energy was directed at the internal extermination of castes and competitors. The old fascist idea unites all lovers and owners of money and directs it against «strangers», rural communism conversely unites the crowd against «parasites» and all people with character and snobbery fall under the name of parasites. The elite of rural communism used the Zerefs for their power, the dictatorship of the party nomenclature. The result was a system of official communism as a counterweight to rising fascism. In fact, the peak of rural fascism and the peak of rural communism fell at the peak of world party building – party against party. Former peasants are gathered in both detachments. Therefore, not only the old communism but also the fascism of the 20th century is also rural. In the 20th century, rural communism opposed rural fascism and even defeated it in 1945. But rural communism fell by itself in an evolutionary way in 1991, together with the USSR. The fall of the USSR was a warning to other «rural» Third World countries: «you’ll end up like us, too, if you go our way.» Objectively, the barbarians also finished off Ancient Rome with its culture, organization, and military machine. The leading elite of the Soviet nomenclature was barbaric, that is, peasants. And they weren’t building socialism. They didn’t know what they were building. Although the elements of the plan and mass organization and discipline worked wonders at first. All barbarians copy the best organization. The Soviet barbaric elite objectively returned to the path of world evolution, from which it turned in 1917, thereby proving that any fascism lacks just a culture of money and its carriers – Zeremids and Refags. Only 30 years have passed and modern Russia has received the population necessary for rural fascism.

What is the difference between rural fascism and rural communism in general?

Replacing any hierarchy (by nobility under the tsar, by position under the soviets) with a culture of money. Since the maturation of the generation of money, and private property, when the rootless townspeople become an organized force (with the help of patriotic slogans), rural fascism evolutionarily matures from this moment – whether you want it or not. Let no one is confused by the accompaniment of rural fascism by the townspeople. Citizens quickly mastered competition, cynicism, and hatred. Accompanying the old fascism with a rural definition is necessary for understanding – communism and fascism of the 20th century is created by the mass of the former traditional population, the Zerefs.