The Third. Covid liberalism

The attitude towards hostile tribes is exactly the opposite. The zeref of the neighboring tribe was also brought up, as was the zeref of this one. Therefore, they are heroes if the neighboring clan is defeated. If one zeref escapes, which is unlikely, because he was not taught cowardice, only courage, then he will be a coward for the people. He would still be a coward if he kept the captured enemy zeref alive. This moment of cruelty and lack of compromise will help us understand why zeref honesty has a weakness.

In addition to the responsibility to the team of relatives, zeref wants to be higher. The zerefs have a zerefs ambition. They want to be above everyone else, always seem to be honorable people.

If we take people completely wild, just to understand the motives in nature itself. Modern zerefs are no less ambitious. They must always seem more authoritative than other zerefs. The more authority, the more honor. The zerot elite, the zerot live very well. They may not even work. Relatives will bring everything necessary themselves. This pronounced desire to be, to look like the elite, while not forgetting about your family and your interests, is perhaps the most obvious quality for today. It is the lack of honesty, which is a responsibility, that makes it easier for zeref to live. There is no need to answer, he may not be responsible for anything, even be beyond the jurisdiction of a modern court, if he is of such a high rank. That the services him, and other traditionalists will benefit from it.

Honesty implies teamwork. Honesty is an invention of civilization. If zeref is honest, he will leave himself and his family hungry. He will almost pity the enemy by analogy with the primitive condition of cowardice. Thus, the modern traditional person will be faced with a choice – to grow up, become authoritative and support a family, feed their children, or show cowardice – to be honest. At the same time, other zerefs will not understand him if he chooses honesty. With honesty, he will work not for his own kind, but for the whole people. It will be like an authoritative zeref from two hostile tribes at once and even more. The entire culture of the ancestral world says that this is contrary to the surrounding nature. Two tribes cannot graze on the same plot. Nature cannot provide two people with food at once. All tribes are great individualists. Their egoism is due to the scarcity of resources and the poverty of technology for the development of nature. This is because in the difficult moments of the economic crisis moreflexible people are the most tenacious. They don’t think about honesty, they don’t know it just by culture.

If any ruler wants to be honest with the people of tradition, he takes a great risk. It risks being misunderstood. He risks being considered an outsider and a mangurt. Few people will want to help him in this. Especially if other zerefs have already seen what they can profit from. And at the market, many traditionally educated people saw a lot of so-called market temptations. And even more so, after mastering a lot of money, no one will want to return it back. So there is no chance of equality. Equality is even more unlikely if there are fewer non-traditional, non-zeref people. After all, all other traditional people will understand them. In the traditional world, therefore, if there is justice, it is specific. Fair or just even good, and not fair, which is good for you and your family. This way it will be clearer to understand the actions of the zerefs.

Glossary:

Zeref- a traditional person with rigidly set social actions, low reflection almost zero, hence the word zeref-reflection zero (zeref).). Has no semitones, serves the idols of the genus, communicates in the circle of native blood. Zeref  has no semitones of perception, is categorical, irreconcilable, hostile to others and to another opinion in the development of rejection of “not your own”

Zerefs loop – the baby boom, overheating of the population.

Zerot- the traditional feudal elite

Zerots loop – the creating a solid cast, an impenetrable social barriers. None of the lower castes can enter the feudal elite. The lack of social mobility pre-revolutionary situation.

CHAPTER III

WHY IS THE ELDEST SON A FASCIST AND THE YOUNGEST A COMMUNIST

What do we know about fascism? We know from Soviet dictionaries that fascism is a reactionary movement of the petty bourgeoisie. Fascism is represented as a negative, a misanthropic current of morality.

The birthplace of the fascist movement is considered to be Italy in the 20s.

But most of all, fascism is associated with the Nazi regime of the Third Reich.

The fascist States profess the monopoly of the state, in plain language, state monopoly capitalism. In other words, they do not deny market relations, but try to put market anarchy under the control of the Nazi idea. The ideological officials, in this case the Nazi officials, were opposed to the cosmopolitan exchange. In this way, elements of paternalism became apparent in the fascist movement. In fact, Nazism turned out to be a continuation of the German feudal tradition. No one was surprised at what was said? One will grow out of the other, no wonder. For what reason it was so hypertrophied, this is a question of another topic. But German statism or a tilt toward state interests did not appear out of thin air. German statism came from German culture, which in turn came from German history. Here, of course, it is appropriate to recall the economic lag in Germany’s development, as its former fragmentation left the Germans without colonies, and therefore without additional resources. Yes, it is. But how German culture turned into the militarization of the Germans. Were it not the Germans themselves, their Dukes, barons, and counts, who most resisted unification? Autarky of the autarky. Similarly, the militarization has occurred from traditional German feudalism. The German official turned out to be almost a German medieval knight. But why did he become a Nazi instead of a cosmopolitan stockbroker, as happened in other civilized Europe?

Big brother.

How could a German family contribute to this?

How did a German official become wildly belligerent?

We could turn to the German tradition. To find the origins of statism in it. We found it in German feudalism. Others will say, why didn’t the same statism manifest itself in Europe in another dream? A radical tilt towards state interests is not only a disease of the Germans. But it was among the Germans that it became radical. Absolutism seems to grow out of absolutism. Totalitarianism from totalitarianism. Paternalism, from paternalism. Nothing is superfluous. So, what is the reason?

Any European father passes the inheritance to the eldest son. Not just German. This eldest son not only inherits lands and things, he passes on the habits of the family to his children. This is how the tradition develops, and this is how the people turn out. Fathers look at their older sons, and their sons try to adopt their father’s look. They imitate him in everything. The transmission from generation to generation of the father’s character, behavior, and style creates this nation. When fathers saw that to the eldest sons (namely, the eldest!) not enough land, not enough inheritance, they armed themselves and went on a campaign. Thus the entire feudal people armed themselves. But the ideologues were the eldest sons, the ones who take over and pass on the tradition from father to son.

In fact, the German official Nazi was not a feudal Lord in disguise, but a new copy of him. He was the eldest son of a German burgher. Throughout Europe, fathers passed on their covenants in the same way, through their elders. It was the older ones who were the heirs of the tradition, and of the property as well. That the people did not turn off the path trodden by their ancestors, and in the end did not disappear as a people, just all the older sons watched this. Some seniors grew old and passed them on to other seniors. Those in turn also grew old, but managed to teach their older sons. All these operations are somehow connected with the earth. There is an invisible connection, a sacred unity of tradition with the aristocracy. The only career for the eldest son is an honorary military career. All the officers in the army are the eldest sons. So why, with the advent of the market, would these senior officers not support the Nazi idea? Younger sons also became officers. If the eldest inherited all the property. The younger ones, having entered the military service, supported the very institution of the traditional family and society.

In the all Europe of the 20s and 30s was ruled by the military. Many modes: in Hungary (Admiral Miklos Horti), Romania (Marshal Antonescu), Poland (Marshal Pilsudski), Portugal (General De Costa), Spain (Generalissimo Franco) did not grow up to Nazism, to the ideology of total superiority, but were authoritarian regimes, dictatorships. But they were very similar to the German regime.

If you have noticed the connection of right-wing totalitarianism, right-wing statism with the entail, that is, with the institution of inheritance to the eldest sons, then now look at what the younger sons are doing at this time.

I would like to ask you to take a particularly close look at Russia. In addition will have to be considered in the development of the movement of anarchists from Italy, Spain and Russia have the same problem. This problem is not so much about bringing anarchism into the arena a little earlier than authoritarian and totalitarian regimes, but rather about getting the problem of younger sons out. In other words, any left-wing and other protest and themes of equality and social justice are tied to the problems of inheritance and the lack of it in the youngest.

«The old man has three sons: the Eldest was a clever fellow, the Middle son was a fool.…

CHAPTER IV

THE NOMADS ALL LOOK ALIKE

The eldest son is smart because he does like a father. The eldest son is the father’s copy. He can’t be stupid by definition. All the older sons are sedate, important, walk strictly, and speak little. Where have you seen old people talking incessantly and crossing the village from end to end? There are no such old people. Older people don’t have much energy. They’ve already used it up. Similarly, the older sons are not noticeable. Although there is still a lot of energy in them. The seniors will not waste it on trivial matters. Everyone is watching them. And the very first eyes in this observation are the eyes of the younger ones. The younger ones are the first to get slapped on the head by the older ones for indecent behavior and stupid behavior. Is there a demand from the younger ones? That’s why all the younger ones are spoiled behavioral waifs. Fools, almost like in a fairy tale by the storyteller Yershov.

If such sons were to inherit, how would they be able to pay them back? No way. They will drink it, waste it, and skip it. How similar it is to the behavior promoted by advertising-take, walk, take advantage of the moment, live is once! If younger sons were not festivalis older brothers, all younger sons it would be possible to write to the Democrats and refuge. Anyone who has had even a little experience with tradition in their biography, and there are many, if not all of them, they will not be able to be a Democrat, even if they are the youngest in the family. In order for the younger to turn into a complete traditional degenerate and reformer, a certain period of the traditional vacuum is necessary. This person should be detached from the tradition, not have younger brothers. Or maybe just the only child in the family. Then no demand. Only self-indulgence. Here the ideology of hedonism is just right. Is this why the ideas of freedom and a market society are popular among young people? After all, this is a different congregation, a city crowd.

Thus, for market apologetics and any other lack of ideas, you need to find a generation born without contact with the land (with the village, aul relatives, without relatives at all).All these young people – the children of the first citizens, and perhaps themselves are zeremids. Only those who did not fall into the ranks of the most loyal people of the ruling autocracy. They lose perspective and, like all younger sons as if deprived of the inheritance. But this conditional inheritance must also be given by the state. But they see, they know, they are also told that they will not see anything. Everything has already been captured and cleaned up by the current elite. They are told from the outside: «They will not share with you. This is not your system or your state»

Now, who was included in the group of the chosen, conditional eldest sons of the authoritarian regime?

After all, all officials in the world behave the same. But if a new autocracy has developed and the imposition of the market on the traditional people, the traditional foundation, what will happen?

Among nomads, the eldest sons behave the same way as the eldest sons of Europe and Russia. They are also invisible and not energetic. It looks like to these disciplined and quiet guys don’t need anything. The nomads have a minorat. The younger sons remain in family with their parents. The elders sons leave. Although they also cut the inheritance. In modern conditions, there is no other path left for the elders sons than that of the Gascon D’Artagnan. But when they get to megacities, they are again very accommodating and tolerant, unlike the Frenchman. It’s hard to tell who’s who among nomads. By culture, all sons behave like future heirs. They are also quiet and catch all the movements of the ruler. Autocracy is constructed by itself. It appeals to the life and circumstances of the moment and in general to the Asian culture itself. All zerafs and zeremids want to be officials, that is, heirs of the state. But «Every one that exalteth himself shall be humbled; but he that humbleth himself shall be exalted». It is impossible for everyone to get into the new elite. Because all unskilled serenity begin to whisper while shyly behind their barkers: Freedom! Democracy! Dictator get out! They were just immersed in the tradition completely. But seeing the futility of silence and the prospect of a whole lot of nothing, they wake up from their own culture’s hibernation. They want to discard the culture they have learned in the villages. And because of this, they also resemble younger sons, spoiled parents.

CHAPTER V

THE YOUNGER ONES AS IDEALISTIC SOCIALISTS

You will not find idealists among the older sons. Even among the urban intelligentsia, the elders behave as if they are ancestors dressed in modern costumes. All their thoughts are directed exclusively to reproduction. Like any prolific rabble, these older sons wander the wilds of neighborhoods in search of a certain favorite. The only idea that they understand and that the poets have thrown at them is love, if by love you can see something more than reproduction (with preliminary dances of the male around the female with sighs, insomnia and stumbling). Older sons are adherents of the old order. And this very love, in fact, old reproduction, they understand as order. Only as an order of age-old reproduction (as it turned out now with verses) And the state should help them in this, and they should help the state.

The younger ones are not like that. In addition to being the very poets who invented love poetry, they are also knights without inheritance. These are road tramps in constant search of a feat and of course they are the Crusaders. Who, if not these youngest, these alien bastards that filled the Holy Land, could respond to the idea of the release of the Empty tomb? They are the same. The eldest in the family is one, and there are many younger ones. The younger ones are fortune hunters among the lowest, from robbers to pirates, but all the younger knights in the world need an idea, otherwise they will not move anywhere. The idea in the younger ones is like future glory.

Similarly, all the younger ones in Russia at the beginning of the 20th century were captured and subjugated by Marxism.

What do we know about Marxism?

That it is like love and sexual intercourse available to all in the world. Everyone, regardless of age, gender, or financial status, can engage in, implement it, to introduce the Marxism to life. Both a nobleman like Lenin and the son of the shoemaker Vissarion – simultaneously and alternately. Both revolutionaries are not eldest sons. Therefore, they were drawn to feats for the name of global social justice.

Actually, for this very justice, Marxism was liked by the people, few people understood anything about fundamental Marxism. And who among the Bolshevik and non-Bolshevik knights of the Marxists understood Marxism?

People liked Marxism precisely because it was a large land-hungry crowd of younger sons, and in addition to them daughters of all ages who married these younger ones or were still brides.

CHAPTER VI

THE ELITE TURNS INTO BIG BROTHERS

What is it that in Germany there were fewer children in the family than in Russia?

What is this question about? We do not want to distract from the fact that in Germany the party of the Nazis, that is, the extreme right, prevailed, and in Russia the party on the contrary, the extreme left, for social justice. Why did the Germans see justice in their national (ethnic) superiority, and the Russians in equality, well, at least equalizing material properties. If we pay less attention to the General poverty and backwardness of Russia, we can see in the detachment of Russian revolutionaries a large number of foreigners, and even more interesting – Jews. As we have already found out, the eldest son of any nation will always be conservative, for the existing order. Do what you want, but like his father, he will be retrograde. And only the Jews, as well as the nomads of today, do not understand who of the son is what age. We will assume that this is a great addition to the revolutionary detachment of internationalists, and even the most intellectual and ideological. Although Karl Marx himself said that of all the interests of this world, Jews are closer only to money. As we can see, this is not the case. In any case, there is some surprising about the revolutionary generation.

Moreover, though Germany was behind in the market from other major European powers, but it was much surpassed Russia in the degree of industrialization. The concentration of the remids, an independent thinking elite according to the revkon, was also significant (urbanization).

If we consider in the prism of tradition, Germany was 1/3 traditional, and Russia 4/5. The crowd of zerefs and zeremids huge masses roamed the cities and there mastered not by choice. The most important reason for such migration, driven also from above, as always in Russia was the crisis. And all over the world the main catalyst for both the crisis and the crowd of «ideological» people is the crisis. The crisis is like disinheriting all people all at once, so that it is even more clear within the topic of older and younger sons.

Have you noticed how the so-called conditional elite of society degrades during the famine? If you have not seen hunger, then at least during the distribution of products on the cards. That’s nothing. If the crowd of citizens is stable and stands in one place. But if the so-called elite also migrates from the former Soviet republics to Russia, that is, it is like peasants fleeing collectivization, it turns into these freshest citizens. With this migration, the entire past elite of prominent citizens in their former place turns into «eldest sons» in the new place. Are these the last of remids transform to zeremids and even zerefs? They degrade for a whole generation. They have nothing to pass on to their children. They all turn into a national concern of the patriots. So that you can understand how the nation of Goethe, Schiller, and Bach turned into conditional savages (from the point of view of left-wing humanists). If the entire group of the former elite is ruined, humiliated, lowered, then they become Nazis, quite naturally.