The Third. Covid liberalism

And in Russia.

If there are only two important megacities in the state, and the population remains almost traditional, then this is the time of younger sons who are hungry for justice.

CHAPTER VII

COMMUNIST THALMANN IN THE ROLE OF IVAN THE FOOL

So, in order to the ideas of the people’s state to be at the top or dominating, it is necessary to have a certain number of conditional older brothers. Younger brothers get the upper hand when this absolute authority is not present. All the old city elite, all these doctors, teachers, lawyers and officials are once again turning into supporters of a hard hand, authoritarianism, do not recognize any tramps from the street, no proletarians with their equalization and social justice fake. Everything that these ragamuffins shouted under the direction of their leaders, all these slogans painted on marching banners, all this was a lie, hypocrisy from the point of view of the urban elite. The traditional perception of caste has not disappeared anywhere. It took a slightly different form. All civil servants and intellectuals turn into conservatives at once. But not in the form of those retrogrades that want to return the feudal castes, no one has yet gone mad to reverse the history of the Revival of feudalism with its rigid castes is possible only with little urbanization at all. Only for nomads is possible. For urbanized peoples, such a revival of history is de facto impossible. The past elite in the form of remids wants to stop this farce of legal equality, even at the cost of curtailing their rights. After all, the Republic is always a Horde of all the younger brothers. It was their democracy, their endless chatter, their permissiveness that led to the crisis. In fact, they violated the law of social hierarchy and led to anarchy. If it is not the elder brother who rules, or even the father, but the younger ones who want authority, this will inevitably lead any family to ruin. If you gather the will of all the younger ones in the Republican Parliament, you will get a violation of tradition within the entire society. This is how all the old intelligentsia turns into supporters of autocracy, dictatorship, and then Nazism, if there is a need to unite everyone with one idea from teachers to lumpmen.

But wait, because in Germany in the 30s, the Communist party also marched cheerfully on squares and streets. In the ranks of the KPD and under the hand of the Communist leader, Telman were a million workers. How did they differ from the Republican younger brothers? Why were they for an even more left-wing social Republic? At least in words in their slogans of the dictatorship of the proletariat.

Everyone who stands for the Republic is a younger brother by definition. It is inferior to others in Patriarchal law. In turn, the one who is inferior in age to all the brothers is a Communist. There are no real brothers in revkon. There are brothers in reflection. Proletarians are the young of the townspeople. They are zeremids. Why did they not join the ranks of the bourgeois and petty-bourgeois Democrats? Вecause all the places in the market and especially in the parliament were occupied when they arrived. The burghers have already filled the city. The only places left for survival are in factories.

Now, the younger brother is not only due to age, but also the practice of life is obliged to get a family by the deadline. He will have children. He becomes a father too. Now he is not even an older brother, but a father, which is even worse for the Republic. Each time he will rule and take the side of all the older brothers and the existing elite. Right or wrong?

The fact is that every father is the founder of a dynasty, and therefore of a family tradition. Whose footsteps will his son follow? Even if it goes to the same factory.

Of course, the Germans under more favorable circumstances could prevail not Bolshevism, but Nazism. That is, the Institute of Junior Republicans of the proletarian type. In this case, the German service elite would have changed its Nazi orientation and become entirely international? Quite possible. For all remids, the state comes first. Let it be not German, but international German – what difference does it make? It does not matter which leader would curb the market bacchanalia.

But Stalin himself would not have needed an advanced Soviet Germany. Stalin needed a German leader-the younger brother and puppet, the sexless leader Telman. Telman must fulfill the will of another form of seniority – the Communist Moscow regime, which by this time was a continuation of the Russian feudal tradition. Stalin’s officials and nomenclature were only called Bolsheviks. The real Bolsheviks, world internationalists, were not yet killed by Stalin de facto, but removed from power. He leaned on his «sons» looking into his mouth, also almost ideologically sexless, but willing to start a family. All according to the same laws of tradition. A quiet heifer sucks the two cows. In the Russian tradition, you don’t have to be the oldest to get an inheritance. In the Russian tradition, obedience itself promised not only pies, but also the love of parents. Any poor Ivan is a fool or Emelya on the stove are not just a folk heroes.

CHAPTER VIII

REMIDS STATESMEN

Well, why did the German statists, supporters of the state still choose Hitler but not Telman? Although Telman was already placed in the category of second-rate German deputies of Stalin. In the years 27—29, Stalin purged Lenin’s third Comintern from leftists. Left people similar to themselves, to their conditional family, because the similarity of brothers is not necessarily external similarity. But it was not the figure and size of Telman’s personality that played a major role in the Germans ' strategic choice.

So, the Germans, unlike the Russians in 1917, preferred the right-wing statists-the Nazis. Although the success of the Russian zerefs was before the eyes of the whole world. And the German Communist party was not a small one. And where else did Marx’s teaching receive the approval of peoples and development? We will say immediately in pursuit of the reason for the choice of the German people. Everyone knows that the dictatorship of the proletariat in various forms of its understanding and interpretation took root only in underdeveloped agricultural countries, and to be more precise – in Asia. In the same Asia, where the word despotism was more consonant with dictate. But why?

From the history of the development of all social systems in the world (and from Engels) we know that the state can be where there is property. Where there was no property and no one could confirm their capabilities, there was the dictate of the most important owner and his vassals.

Even the comparison and evidence of the backwardness of the future Communist communities does not clarify the specifics. Yes, more technically underdeveloped. Yes, the culture has more emotions and a tilt towards mythology. Rational peoples do not believe in fairy tales at all. And traditional ones avoid rationality. Rational and meticulous Marxism appealed to the traditional peoples not by its content, but by its completion. Where at the end of the Marxist teaching good overcomes evil, there was a coincidence of myth and Marxism, they met without logic for love.

But did the Germans abandon the tradition?

No, the Germans did not abandon the tradition. They remained loyal to their German state. Do you think that in the rational cold world of property and money the ancient castes were abandoned? No way. The teaching of the revkon says from the very beginning: the traditional (zeref) world has no semitones. The world of citizenship, the market, and money has many such halftones. They are like rubber shock absorbers, spacers between strata, cellophane with bubbles-they soften the relationship of superiority and humiliation. In the bourgeois world it is not clear who is the master and who is his servant. Outside, everyone is walking the same way. Only very fine details are visible to old-timers and professionals. Castes are everywhere. The details and signals of the elite have stopped shouting and are located outside, so that a hundred steps away you can see who is who. It is among primitive peoples that all the virtues are shown by clothing and drawn on the face.

The Germans remained true to the tradition of German semitones. They did not turn over their social pyramid. They didn’t destroy their middle class.

The remids are simply fanatics of the state. German revolutionaries, German waves of indignation, approached the remids just as the Russian peasants approached their landlords in a tight line. But they (the German middle class) were not liquidated, beaten to death, or stabbed. And listened them. The German remids, these German fanatics of Germany, the second Holy Roman Empire and state, seemed familiar to them. They saw themselves in them, but eventually the zerefs become zeremids, the zeremids become remids, everything is consistent and evolutionary. Even in reflection. (Who is this teacher or doctor? His great-grandfather or grandfather was also a peasant, and his father was a Philistine. A doctor and a teacher are successful careers. Well, a modern state cannot exist without them).

In the countries of the age-old despotism, the pyramid is reversed radically. There is no gradualness, but there is a jump. In addition, the proletarians did not come to lawyers, doctors and teachers for advice. And the doctors and teachers tell them silently about the great state with their lips. They were a pitiful, defenseless lot, just as clenched and disenfranchised.

In addition, if excited peasants came to the feudal lords and they did not agree, they destroyed them. What kind of peasant revolt is it? The meaningless and merciless… as the poet Pushkin called the Russian revolt

If we look at the facts. Then all the new leaders of the workers cut out the «exploiters» as the Eastern despots, but vice versa. Not the feudal despots cut peasant uprising of peasants, as it was not once but many times over the centuries, but now the Marxist leaders cut all feudal lords. They change places. The results of local evolution were carved with feudal precision. This is not only evident in Stalin’s repressions. Look at the exploits of the revolutionaries in Kampuchea. All the local intelligentsia, more or less educated people, were cut out at the root. Even the bespectacled, the person who wears glasses was the enemy.

Remids-statesmen cannot be destroyed. The middle class can’t be touched.

If this happened under Marxism or at the direction of the leader of the Asian peasantry. Then they themselves, like the Hydra, will have to replace the severed heads. Instead of demolished ones, put your own. But the whole problem is that the state will lose from the new evolution. The newly raised heads of the officials will look in the wrong direction. Not in the direction of state property, but in the direction of oneself. For the idea of the state is a failure. For the fate of the state this means failure. But now there is only the body of the state and the eternally hungry heads of officials. But why are they always hungry?

Glossary:

Zeref- a traditional person with rigidly set social actions, low reflection almost zero, hence the word zeref-reflection zero (zeref).). Has no semitones, serves the idols of the genus, communicates in the circle of native blood. Zeref has no semitones of perception, is categorical, irreconcilable, hostile to others and to another opinion in the development of rejection of «not your own»

Zerefs loop – the baby boom, overheating of the population.

Zerot- the traditional feudal elite

Zerots loop – the creating a solid cast, an impenetrable social barriers. None of the lower castes can enter the feudal elite. The lack of social mobility pre-revolutionary situation.

Remid – a New traditional elite, rulers, officials, authorities, teachers; remid put actions for zerefs, determine morality, laws, politics, reflection average-middle (remiddle).

Remids loop – the struggle of the elite with the brightest personality, the collusion of second and third parties against the hero and the prophet.

Refag- person of a trading civilization in several generations, reflection is high, selfish, utilitarian-refag (re + high).

Zeremid is a first-generation city person, has a half-rigid social reflex of custom and new skills of city life, half-urban, half-rural.

Zeremids loop – the zeremids are approximate imitators. They imitate the elite, any idea, any direction just to be good for their families. By imitation, hypocrisy, and even fanaticism, they harm any cause, state, or idea.

Zefa is a man from the first generation of the city with a tendency towards the market and speculation, and to trade, at least something, he was forced by circumstances.

revcon – revolutio-conservatism

CHAPTER IX

THERE’S NO SUCH THING AS STATE!

When German zerefs and zeremids turned to their authority figures – evolutionary examples of how no one became someone: a doctor, a teacher, a lawyer – what were they told? Although in fact they never communicated, I will assume here, for the sake of discussion, that they did – and that the doctors, teachers, and lawyers did have something to tell those following in their footsteps. How did this German solidarity come about?

All those doctors, teachers, and lawyers (not to mention the small merchants and street vendors defined in Marxism) were the bourgeoisie (also defined in Marxism). Or the middle class, as we call it today. So who approached them, and why?

Recessions affect people regardless of their social class. But it is manual and office workers, peasants, and the poor who take the brunt. Bourgeois classes are different. As we can see, and as has been portrayed to us in the past, the uncontrollable greed of the upper bourgeoisie causes the market to overheat (as far as goods, capital, and speculation go). That adversely affects the market and market agents, and then the state itself. Mass layoffs result in unemployment. Needless to say, small profiteers stand as good a chance of going bankrupt as major factory owners. The state cannot help them (except maybe by giving out soup). Prices first soar so high public servants cannot afford to buy things they can’t do without; and then plummet as the market begins to lure buyers. Still, the public servants are essentially broke.

Times like these see everyone point their finger at the prime minister, not the largest exchange speculator. The prime minister is the one to blame! He has failed to prevent speculation. Ordinary people blame the recession on the government and, by extension, the state. Land-poor peasants and tenant farmers go bankrupt; they have to flock to cities, either because they don’t earn enough to pay the rent or because no one buys their produce. These zerefs, heirs of tradition, join the army of unemployed urban zeremids. The zeremids know for certain the blame lies with the state. But the rural zerefs go even further in searching for an answer to the question, «Who hung the government out to dry?» Those on your side could have never done such a thing. Only an enemy could. An enemy of the people and of the state.

To zerefs, all the harm comes from the enemy of the people, of the ethnos; to zeremids, the prime minister is the enemy. Doctors and teachers, however, have no enemies. With that said, they might have some. After all, remids are former zeremids and zerefs. They, too, may know what office the enemy holds and what ethnic group they belong to. But remids are statists. They are the ones who have the weight of the general public on their shoulders. That’s why they agree that public officials are to blame, but they don’t think the state shares that blame. The state is sacrosanct. The state – the land of the fathers, Alemania, vaterland – is paramount.

Remids’ self-reflection is highly developed. They may disown the specific. But they save the state and declare it innocent. It is the confluence of the low notes coming from zerefs and the high tones from middle-class clusters that brings German statism to life in the form of Nazism. Silent appeals are then heard by zeremid leaders – who also come as a rule from provincial regions and from families of the rural intelligentsia – and the leaders turn those appeals into a choir, a cacophony of yelling throats.

German Nazism resulted from a combination of zerefs’ grievances and zeremids’ complexes on the one hand and the romantic haze of the German state (brought about by remids) on the other. German doctors, teachers, and public officials were saving their state while zerefs and zeremids were inflating the guilt of the enemy. Each reflection group contributed to German Nazism. The concentration of the middle layer or the high urbanization rate blocked another way out – class struggle. Tradition led the people, though they were unaware of it.

Everyone, not only Germans, wants to start a family, and that requires taking your status up a notch. Some societies and peoples think of it as the wellbeing of their families and ethnos; others, as the prosperity of their state. Thanks to remids, the state can guarantee prosperity for the people and the ethnos, even though the initial groups of tradition (and reflection) do not concur.

In Russia, the middle class was insignificant. At the time of crisis, armed workers and sailors (peasants in disguise) entered into a fateful dialogue not with doctors and teachers but with the nobility. Did they have no one to tell about the Russian state? And what state, one of the tsar and the priests? The discussion revolved around the public, not the state. There was no state anymore. It had all been self-deception.

CHAPTER X