ὕβρις, Il. i. 203, 214. ἐφυβρίζων, Il. ix. 368, also 646-8.
694
Il. ix. 370-6: when he returns again and again to the word: ἐξαπατήσειν, 371; ἀπάτησε, 375; ἐξαπάφοιτο, 376.
695
Il. i. 152.
696
Ibid. 165-8.
697
Il. v. 789.
698
Il. i. 225-8.
699
The ἄλλα, v. 300, must mean what he had not acquired by gift of the army; since in Il. 9. 335, as well as in i. 167, 356, he apparently speaks of Briseis as the only prize he had received.
700
Il. v. 605, 702.
701
Il. ix. 26.
702
Il. xix. 67.
703
Ibid. 134-8.
704
Od. viii. 390-415.
705
Il. ix. 336.
706
Il. i. 352-4.
707
Il. ix. 624-42. Sup. Agorè, p. 111 (#x_12_i92).
708
Ibid. 237-43, and 304-6.
709
Ibid. 357.
710
Ibid. 617.
711
Il. ix. 649-55.
712
On the character of Achilles, I recommend reference to Colonel Mure, Lit. Greece, i. 273-91, and 304-14. In no part of his treatment of the poems has that excellent Homerist (if I may presume to say so) done better service. See likewise Professor Wilson’s Essays, Critique iv: and the Prælections of the Rev. J. Keble, i. 90-104. This refined work, which criticizes the poems in the spirit of a Bard, set an early example, at least to England, of elevating the tone of Homeric study.
713
Il. xvi. 780.
714
Il. vii. 93.
715
Since the first portion of this work went to press, I have found from the recent and still unfinished work of Welcher, Griechische Götterlehre, i. 2. n., that philological evidence appears to have been recently obtained of a close relationship between the Lycians and the Greeks.
716
Il. xii. 397-9.
717
Il. xi. 67-83.
718