Последний отзыв
Да, первый рассказ из сборника, что я успела прочитать, что надо! И написано хорошо, и содержание необычное, но жизненное. Очень понравилось, хотя там...
Далее
По всем вопросам обращайтесь на: info@litportal.ru
(©) 2003-2024.
✖
A History of Inventions, Discoveries, and Origins, Volume I (of 2)
Настройки чтения
Размер шрифта
Высота строк
Поля
1290
Dioscor. l. ii. c. 171.
1291
Geopon. l. ix. c. 28.
1292
Varro, lib. i. cap. 31. That a kind of meslin is here to be understood, has been supposed by Stephanus, in his Prædium Rusticum, p. 493; and Matthiolus is of the same opinion. See Matthioli Opera, p. 408. Buck-wheat may have been employed green as fodder; and it is indeed often sown for that use; but there are many other plants which can be employed for the like purpose.
1293
Dioscorid. l. ii. c. 188.
1294
Theophrast. p. 941.
1295
Plin. lib. xviii. cap. 10. He says in the same place, and also p. 291, that the erysimum was by the Latins called also irio; and hence it is that Ruellius and other old botanists give that name to buck-wheat.
1296
The first edition was published in octavo, at Lyons, in 1560. Two editions I have now before me; the first is called Dipnosophia seu Sitologia, Francofurti, 1606, 8vo. The other Joan. Bruyerini Cibus Medicus, Norimbergæ, 1659, 8vo. The author was a grandson of Symphorien Champier, whose works are mentioned in Haller’s Biblioth. Botan. i. p. 246.
1297
De Natura Stirpium, Basiliæ, 1543, fol. p. 324.
1298
Rei Rusticæ Libri Quatuor. Spiræ Nemetum, 1595, 8vo, p. 120. He calls it triticum faginum, φαγόπυρον, or nigrum triticum, buck-wheat.
1299
Le Grand d’Aussy quotes from this book in his Histoire de la Vie Privee des François, i. p. 106, the following words: “Sans ce grain, qui nous est venu depuis soixante ans, les pauvres gens auraient beaucoup à suffrir.”
1300
M. Schookii Liber de Cervisia. Groningæ, 1661, 12mo.
1301
Lobelii Stirpium Adversaria. Antv. 1576, fol. p. 395. – Bauhini Hist. Plant. ii. p. 993. – Chabræi Stirpium Sciagraphia. Gen. 1666, fol. p. 312, and in App. p. 627. – C. Bauhini Theatr. Bot. p. 530.
1302
The beech-tree in German is called Buche or Buke, in Danish Bög, and in Swedish, Russian, Polish, and Bohemian, Buk.
1303
Wörterbuch, p. 434. This derivation may be found also in Martinii Lexicon, art. Fagopyrum.
1304
Buck-wheat is sometimes named by botanists frumentum ethnicum (heathen-corn), and triticum Saracenicum, because some have supposed that it was introduced into Europe from Africa by the Saracens.
1305
A particular description of this scarce bible may be found in J. H. a Seelen’s Selecta Litteraria, Lubecæ, 1726, 8vo, p. 398, 409.
1306
This small work is entitled Vocabula Rei Nummariæ, &c. Additæ sunt Appellationes Quadrupedum, et Frugum, a Paulo Ebero et Casp. Peucero. Witebergæ, 1552, 8vo.
1307
Dictionarium Latino-Germanicum. Argentorati, 4to.
1308
Nya Swenska Economiska Dict. Stockh. 1780, 8vo, vol. ii.
1309
Abhandlungen der Schwedisch. Akad. der Wissenschaften, vi. p. 107, where is given, as far as I know, the first figure of it.
1310
Stirpes Rariores Imperii Russici, 1739, 4to.
1311
Ehrhart’s Œkonomische Pflanzen Historie, viii. p. 72.
1312
Ruellius De Natura Stirp. lib. ii. cap. 27. Some very improperly have considered this plant as Turkish wheat.
1313
Several species of this genus were cultivated in the southern districts. Their distinguishing characteristics do not however appear as yet to be fully established. Bauhin makes the proper sorghum to be different from the durra of the Arabs. Linnæus in his last writings has separated Holcus bicolor from sorghum. Forskal thus describes the durra: “Holcus panicula ovata; spiculis sessilibus, subvillosis; alternatim appendiculatis; flosculo uno vel duobus vacuis, sessilibus.” There are kinds of it with white and reddish-yellow (fulva) seeds. According to his account, however, the Arabs cultivate another kind known under the name of dochna, though in less quantity, chiefly as food for fowls.
1314
Lib. xviii. cap. 7. Holcus sorghum is sold at Venice for brooms, as we are told by Ray in his Hist. Plant.
Dioscor. l. ii. c. 171.
1291
Geopon. l. ix. c. 28.
1292
Varro, lib. i. cap. 31. That a kind of meslin is here to be understood, has been supposed by Stephanus, in his Prædium Rusticum, p. 493; and Matthiolus is of the same opinion. See Matthioli Opera, p. 408. Buck-wheat may have been employed green as fodder; and it is indeed often sown for that use; but there are many other plants which can be employed for the like purpose.
1293
Dioscorid. l. ii. c. 188.
1294
Theophrast. p. 941.
1295
Plin. lib. xviii. cap. 10. He says in the same place, and also p. 291, that the erysimum was by the Latins called also irio; and hence it is that Ruellius and other old botanists give that name to buck-wheat.
1296
The first edition was published in octavo, at Lyons, in 1560. Two editions I have now before me; the first is called Dipnosophia seu Sitologia, Francofurti, 1606, 8vo. The other Joan. Bruyerini Cibus Medicus, Norimbergæ, 1659, 8vo. The author was a grandson of Symphorien Champier, whose works are mentioned in Haller’s Biblioth. Botan. i. p. 246.
1297
De Natura Stirpium, Basiliæ, 1543, fol. p. 324.
1298
Rei Rusticæ Libri Quatuor. Spiræ Nemetum, 1595, 8vo, p. 120. He calls it triticum faginum, φαγόπυρον, or nigrum triticum, buck-wheat.
1299
Le Grand d’Aussy quotes from this book in his Histoire de la Vie Privee des François, i. p. 106, the following words: “Sans ce grain, qui nous est venu depuis soixante ans, les pauvres gens auraient beaucoup à suffrir.”
1300
M. Schookii Liber de Cervisia. Groningæ, 1661, 12mo.
1301
Lobelii Stirpium Adversaria. Antv. 1576, fol. p. 395. – Bauhini Hist. Plant. ii. p. 993. – Chabræi Stirpium Sciagraphia. Gen. 1666, fol. p. 312, and in App. p. 627. – C. Bauhini Theatr. Bot. p. 530.
1302
The beech-tree in German is called Buche or Buke, in Danish Bög, and in Swedish, Russian, Polish, and Bohemian, Buk.
1303
Wörterbuch, p. 434. This derivation may be found also in Martinii Lexicon, art. Fagopyrum.
1304
Buck-wheat is sometimes named by botanists frumentum ethnicum (heathen-corn), and triticum Saracenicum, because some have supposed that it was introduced into Europe from Africa by the Saracens.
1305
A particular description of this scarce bible may be found in J. H. a Seelen’s Selecta Litteraria, Lubecæ, 1726, 8vo, p. 398, 409.
1306
This small work is entitled Vocabula Rei Nummariæ, &c. Additæ sunt Appellationes Quadrupedum, et Frugum, a Paulo Ebero et Casp. Peucero. Witebergæ, 1552, 8vo.
1307
Dictionarium Latino-Germanicum. Argentorati, 4to.
1308
Nya Swenska Economiska Dict. Stockh. 1780, 8vo, vol. ii.
1309
Abhandlungen der Schwedisch. Akad. der Wissenschaften, vi. p. 107, where is given, as far as I know, the first figure of it.
1310
Stirpes Rariores Imperii Russici, 1739, 4to.
1311
Ehrhart’s Œkonomische Pflanzen Historie, viii. p. 72.
1312
Ruellius De Natura Stirp. lib. ii. cap. 27. Some very improperly have considered this plant as Turkish wheat.
1313
Several species of this genus were cultivated in the southern districts. Their distinguishing characteristics do not however appear as yet to be fully established. Bauhin makes the proper sorghum to be different from the durra of the Arabs. Linnæus in his last writings has separated Holcus bicolor from sorghum. Forskal thus describes the durra: “Holcus panicula ovata; spiculis sessilibus, subvillosis; alternatim appendiculatis; flosculo uno vel duobus vacuis, sessilibus.” There are kinds of it with white and reddish-yellow (fulva) seeds. According to his account, however, the Arabs cultivate another kind known under the name of dochna, though in less quantity, chiefly as food for fowls.
1314
Lib. xviii. cap. 7. Holcus sorghum is sold at Venice for brooms, as we are told by Ray in his Hist. Plant.
Другие электронные книги автора Johann Beckmann
Последний отзыв
Да, первый рассказ из сборника, что я успела прочитать, что надо! И написано хорошо, и содержание необычное, но жизненное. Очень понравилось, хотя там...
Далее