Island Life; Or, The Phenomena and Causes of Insular Faunas and Floras

It is therefore no matter of surprise, but exactly what we should expect, that the great mass of pre-eminently temperate Australian genera should be absent from New Zealand, including the whole of such important families as, Dilleniaceæ, Tremandreæ, Buettneriacæ, Polygaleæ, Casuarineæ and Hæmodoraceæ; while others, such as Rutaceæ, Stackhousieæ, Rhamneæ, Myrtaceæ, Proteaceæ, and Santalaceæ, are represented by only a few species. Thus, too, we can explain the absence of all the peculiar Australian Leguminosæ; for these were still mainly confined to the great western island, along with the peculiar Acacias and Eucalypti, which at a later period spread over the whole continent. It is equally accordant with the view we are maintaining, that among the groups which Sir Joseph Hooker enumerates as "keeping up the features of extra tropical Australia in its tropical quarter," several should have reached New Zealand, such as Drosera, some Pittosporeæ and Myoporineæ, with a few Proteaceæ, Loganiaceæ, and Restiaceæ; for most of these are not only found in tropical Australia, but also in the Malayan and Pacific islands.

Tropical Character of the New Zealand Flora Explained.—In this origin of the New Zealand fauna by a north-western route from North-eastern Australia, we find also an explanation of the remarkable number of tropical groups of plants found there: for though, as Sir Joseph Hooker has shown, a moist and uniform climate favours the extension of tropical forms in the temperate zone, yet some means must be afforded them for reaching a temperate island. On carefully going through the Handbook, and comparing its indications with those of Bentham's Flora Australiensis, I find that there are in New Zealand thirty-eight thoroughly tropical genera, thirty-three of which are found in Australia—mostly in the tropical portion of it, though a few are temperate, and these may have reached it through New Zealand[187 - The following are the tropical genera common to New Zealand and Australia:—1. Melicope. Queensland, Pacific Islands.2. Eugenia. Eastern and Tropical Australia, Asia, and America.3. Passiflora. N.S.W. and Queensland, Tropics of Old World and America.4. Myrsine. Tropical and Temperate Australia, Tropical and Sub-tropical regions.5. Sapota. Australia, Norfolk Islands, Tropics.6. Cyathodes. Australia and Pacific Islands.7. Parsonsia. Tropical Australia and Asia.8. Geniostoma. Queensland, Polynesia, Asia.9. Mitrasacme. Tropical and Temperate Australia, India.10. Ipomœa. Tropical Australia, Tropics.11. Mazus. Temperate Australia, India, China.12. Vitex. Tropical Australia, Tropical and Sub-tropical.13. Pisonia. Tropical Australia, Tropical and Sub-tropical.14. Alternanthera. Tropical Australia, India, and S. America.15. Tetranthera. Tropical Australia, Tropics.16. Santalum. Tropical and Sub-tropical Australia, Pacific, Malay Islands.17. Carumbium. Tropical and Sub-tropical Australia, Pacific Islands.18. Elatostemma. Sub-tropical Australia, Asia, Pacific Islands.19. Peperomia. Tropical and Sub-tropical Australia, Tropics.20. Piper. Tropical and Sub-tropical Australia, Tropics.21. Dacrydium. Tasmania, Malay, and Pacific Islands.22. Dammara. Tropical Australia, Malay, and Pacific Islands.23. Dendrobium. Tropical Australia, Eastern Tropics.24. Bolbophyllum. Tropical and Sub-tropical Australia, Tropics.25. Sarcochilus. Tropical and Sub-tropical Australia, Fiji, and Malay Islands.26. Freycinetia. Tropical Australia, Tropical Asia.27. Cordyline. Tropical Australia, Pacific Islands.28. Dianella. Australia, India, Madagascar, Pacific Islands.29. Cyperus. Australia, Tropical regions mainly.30. Fimbristylis. Tropical Australia, Tropical regions.31. Paspalum. Tropical and Sub-tropical grasses.32. Isachne. Tropical and Sub-tropical grasses.33. Sporobolus. Tropical and Sub-tropical grasses.]. To these we must add thirty-two more genera, which, though chiefly developed in temperate Australia, extend into the tropical or sub-tropical portions of it, and may well have reached New Zealand by the same route.

On the other hand we find but few New Zealand genera certainly derived from Australia which are especially temperate, and it may be as well to give a list of such as do occur with a few remarks. They are sixteen in number, as follows:—

1. Pennantia (1 sp.). This genus has a species in Norfolk Island, indicating perhaps its former extension to the north-west.

2. Pomaderris (3 sp.). One species inhabits Victoria and New Zealand, indicating recent trans-oceanic migration.

3. Quintinia (2 sp.). This genus has winged seeds facilitating migration.

4. Olearia (20 sp.). Seeds with pappus.

5. Craspedia (2 sp.). Seeds with pappus. Alpine; identical with Australian species, and therefore of comparatively recent introduction.

6. Celmisia (25 sp.). Seeds with pappus. Only three Australian species, two of which are identical with New Zealand forms, probably therefore derived from New Zealand.

7. Ozothamnus (5 sp.). Seeds with pappus.

8. Epacris (4 sp.). Minute seeds. Some species are sub-tropical, and they are all found in the northern (warmer) island of New Zealand.

9. Archeria (2 sp.). Minute seeds. A species common to E. Australia and New Zealand.

10. Logania (3 sp.). Small seeds. Alpine plants.

11. Hedycarya (1 sp.).

12. Chiloglottis (1 sp.). Minute seeds. In Auckland Islands; alpine in Australia.

13. Prasophyllum (1 sp.). Minute seeds. Identical with Australian species, indicating recent transmission.

14. Orthoceras (1 sp.). Minute seeds. Identical with an Australian species.

15. Alepyrum (1 sp.). Alpine, moss-like. An Antarctic type.

16. Dichelachne (3 sp.). Identical with Australian species. An awned grass.

We thus see that there are special features in most of these plants that would facilitate transmission across the sea between temperate Australia and New Zealand, or to both from some Antarctic island; and the fact that in several of them the species are absolutely identical shows that such transmission has occurred in geologically recent times.

Species Common to New Zealand and Australia Mostly Temperate Forms.—Let us now take the species which are common to New Zealand and Australia, but found nowhere else, and which must therefore have passed from one country to the other at a more recent period than the mass of genera with which we have hitherto been dealing. These are ninety-six in number, and they present a striking contrast to the similarly restricted genera in being wholly temperate in character, the entire list presenting only a single species which is confined to sub-tropical East Australia—a grass (Apera arundinacea) only found in a few localities on the New Zealand coast.

Now it is clear that the larger portion, if not the whole, of these plants must have reached New Zealand from Australia (or in a few cases Australia from New Zealand), by transmission across the sea, because we know there has been no actual land connection during the Tertiary period, as proved by the absence of all the Australian mammalia, and almost all the most characteristic Australian birds, insects, and plants. The form of the sea-bed shows that the distance could not have been less than 600 miles, even during the greatest extension of Southern New Zealand and Tasmania; and we have no reason to suppose it to have been less, because in other cases an equally abundant flora of identical species has reached islands at a still greater distance—notably in the case of the Azores and Bermuda. The character of the plants is also just what we should expect: for about two-thirds of them belong to genera of world-wide range in the temperate zones, such as Ranunculus, Drosera, Epilobium, Gnaphalium, Senecio, Convolvulus, Atriplex, Luzula, and many sedges and grasses, whose exceptionally wide distribution shows that they possess exceptional powers of dispersal and vigour of constitution, enabling them not only to reach distant countries, but also to establish themselves there. Another set of plants belong to especially Antarctic or south temperate groups, such as Colobanthus, Acæna, Gaultheria, Pernettya, and Muhlenbeckia, and these may in some cases have reached both Australia and New Zealand from some now submerged Antarctic island. Again, about one-fourth of the whole are alpine plants, and these possess two advantages as colonisers. Their lofty stations place them in the best position to have their seeds carried away by winds; and they would in this case reach a country which, having derived the earlier portion of its flora from the side of the tropics, would be likely to have its higher mountains and favourable alpine stations to a great extent unoccupied, or occupied by plants unable to compete with specially adapted alpine groups.

Fully one-third of the exclusively Australo-New Zealand species belong to the two great orders of the sedges and the grasses; and there can be no doubt that these have great facilities for dispersion in a variety of ways. Their seeds, often enveloped in chaffy glumes, would be carried long distances by storms of wind, and even if finally dropped into the sea would have so much less distance to reach the land by means of surface currents; and Mr. Darwin's experiments show that even cultivated oats germinated after 100 days' immersion in sea-water. Others have hispid awns by which they would become attached to the feathers of birds, and there is no doubt this is an effective mode of dispersal. But a still more important point is, probably, that these plants are generally, if not always, wind-fertilised, and are thus independent of any peculiar insects, which might be wanting in the new country.

Why Easily-Dispersed Plants have often Restricted Ranges.—This last consideration throws light on a very curious point, which has been noted as a difficulty by Sir Joseph Hooker, that plants which have most clear and decided powers of dispersal by wind or other means, have not generally the widest specific range; and he instances the small number of Compositæ common to New Zealand and Australia. But in all these cases it will, I think, be found that although the species have not a wide range the genera often have. In New Zealand, for instance, the Compositæ are very abundant, there being no less than 167 species, almost all belonging to Australian genera, yet only about one-sixteenth of the whole are identical in the two countries. The explanation of this is not difficult. Owing to their great powers of dispersal, the Australian Compositæ reached New Zealand at a very remote epoch, and such as were adapted to the climate and the means of fertilisation established themselves; but being highly organised plants with great flexibility of organisation, they soon became modified in accordance with the new conditions, producing many special forms in different localities; and these, spreading widely, soon took possession of all suitable stations. Henceforth immigrants from Australia had to compete with these indigenous and well-established plants, and only in a few cases were able to obtain a footing; whence it arises that we have many Australian types, but few Australian species, in New Zealand, and both phenomena are directly traceable to the combination of great powers of dispersal with a high degree of adaptability. Exactly the same thing occurs with the still more highly specialised Orchideæ. These are not proportionally so numerous in New Zealand (thirty-eight species), and this is no doubt due to the fact that so many of them require insect-fertilisation often by a particular family or genus (whereas almost any insect will fertilise Compositæ), and insects of all orders are remarkably scarce in New Zealand.[188 - Insects are tolerably abundant in the open mountain regions, but very scarce in the forests. Mr. Meyrick says that these are "strangely deficient in insects, the same species occurring throughout the islands;" and Mr. Pascoe remarked that "the forests of New Zealand were the most barren country, entomologically, he had ever visited." (Proc. Ent. Soc., 1883. p. xxix.)] This would at once prevent the establishment of many of the orchids which may have reached the islands, while those which did find suitable fertilisers and other favourable conditions would soon become modified into new species. It is thus quite intelligible why only three species of orchids are identical in Australia and New Zealand, although their minute and abundant seeds must be dispersed by the wind almost as readily as the spores of ferns.

Another specialised group—the Scrophularineæ—abounds in New Zealand, where there are sixty-two species; but though almost all the genera are Australian only three species are so. Here, too, the seeds are usually very small, and the powers of dispersal great, as shown by several European genera—Veronica, Euphrasia, and Limosella, being found in the southern hemisphere.

Looking at the whole series of these Australo-New Zealand plants, we find the most highly specialised groups—Compositæ, Scrophularineæ, Orchideæ—with a small proportion of identical species (one-thirteenth to one twentieth), the less highly specialised—Ranunculaceæ, Onagrariæ and Ericeæ—with a higher proportion (one-ninth to one-sixth), and the least specialised—Junceæ, Cyperaceæ and Gramineæ—with the high proportion in each case of one-fourth. These nine are the most important New Zealand orders which contain species common to that country and Australia and confined to them; and the marked correspondence they show between high specialisation and want of specific identity, while the generic identity is in all cases approximately equal, points to the conclusion that the means of diffusion are, in almost all plants ample, when long periods of time are concerned, and that diversities in this respect are not so important in determining the peculiar character of a derived flora, as adaptability to varied conditions, great powers of multiplication, and inherent vigour of constitution. This point will have to be more fully discussed in treating of the origin of the Antarctic and north temperate members of the New Zealand flora.

Summary and Conclusion on the New Zealand Flora.—Confining ourselves strictly to the direct relations between the plants of New Zealand and of Australia, as I have done in the preceding discussion, I think I may claim to have shown that the union between the two countries in the latter part of the Secondary epoch at a time when Eastern Australia was widely separated from Western Australia (as shown by its geological formation and by the contour of the sea-bottom) does sufficiently account for all the main features of the New Zealand flora. It shows why the basis of the flora is fundamentally Australian both as regards orders and genera, for it was due either to a direct land connection or a somewhat close approximation between the two countries. It shows also why the great mass of typical Australian forms are unrepresented, for the Australian flora is typically western and temperate, and New Zealand received its immigrants from the eastern island which had itself received only a fragment of this flora, and from the tropical end of this island, and thus could only receive such forms as were not exclusively temperate in character. It shows, further, why New Zealand contains such a very large proportion of tropical forms, for we see that it derived the main portion of its flora directly from the tropics. Again, this hypothesis shows us why, though the specially Australian genera in New Zealand are largely tropical or sub-tropical, the specially Australian species are wholly temperate or alpine; for these are comparatively recent arrivals, they must have migrated across the sea in the temperate zone, and these temperate and alpine forms are exactly such as would be best able to establish themselves in a country already stocked mainly by tropical forms and their modified descendants. This hypothesis further fulfils the conditions implied in Sir Joseph Hooker's anticipation that—"these great differences (of the floras) will present the least difficulties to whatever theory may explain the whole case,"—for it shows that these differences are directly due to the history and development of the Australian flora itself, while the resemblances depend upon the most certain cause of all such broad resemblances—close proximity or actual land connection.

One objection will undoubtedly be made to the above theory,—that it does not explain why some species of the prominent Australian genera Acacia, Eucalyptus, Melaleuca, Grevillea, &c., have not reached New Zealand in recent times along with the other temperate forms that have established themselves. But it is doubtful whether any detailed explanation of such a negative fact is possible, while general explanations sufficient to cover it are not wanting. Nothing is more certain than that numerous plants never run wild and establish themselves in countries where they nevertheless grow freely if cultivated; and the explanation of this fact given by Mr. Darwin—that they are prevented doing so by the competition of better adapted forms—is held to be sufficient. In this particular case, however, we have some very remarkable evidence of the fact of their non-adaptation. The intercourse between New Zealand and Europe has been the means of introducing a host of common European plants,—more than 150 in number, as enumerated at the end of the second volume of the Handbook; yet, although the intercourse with Australia has probably been greater, only two or three Australian plants have similarly established themselves. More remarkable still, Sir Joseph Hooker states: "I am informed that the late Mr. Bidwell habitually scattered Australian seeds during his extensive travels in New Zealand." We may be pretty sure that seeds of such excessively common and characteristic groups as Acacia and Eucalyptus would be among those so scattered, yet we have no record of any plants of these or other peculiar Australian genera ever having been found wild, still less of their having spread and taken possession of the soil in the way that many European plants have done. We are, then, entitled to conclude that the plants above referred to have not established themselves in New Zealand (although their seeds may have reached it) because they could not successfully compete with the indigenous flora which was already well established and better adapted to the conditions of climate and of the organic environment. This explanation is so perfectly in accordance with a large body of well-known facts, including that which is known to every one—how few of our oldest and hardiest garden plants ever run wild—that the objection above stated will, I feel convinced, have no real weight with any naturalists who have paid attention to this class of questions.

CHAPTER XXIII

ON THE ARCTIC ELEMENT IN SOUTH TEMPERATE FLORAS

European Species and Genera of Plants in the Southern Hemisphere—Aggressive Power of the Scandinavian Flora—Means by which Plants have Migrated from North to South—Newly moved Soil as Affording Temporary Stations to Migrating Plants—Elevation and Depression of the Snow-line as Aiding the Migration of Plants—Changes of Climate Favourable to Migration—The Migration from North to South has been long going on—Geological Changes as Aiding Migration—Proofs of Migration by way of the Andes—Proofs of Migration by way of the Himalayas and Southern Asia—Proofs of Migration by way of the African Highlands—Supposed Connection of South Africa and Australia—The Endemic Genera of Plants in New Zealand—The Absence of Southern Types from the Northern Hemisphere—Concluding Remarks on the New Zealand and South Temperate Floras.

We have now to deal with another portion of the New Zealand flora which presents perhaps equal difficulties—that which appears to have been derived from remote parts of the north and south temperate zones; and this will lead us to inquire into the origin of the northern or Arctic element in all the south temperate floras.

More than one-third of the entire number of New Zealand genera (115) are found also in Europe, and even fifty-eight species are identical in these remote parts of the world. Temperate South America has seventy-four genera in common with New Zealand, and there are even eleven species identical in the two countries, as well as thirty-two which are close allies or representative species. A considerable number of these northern or Antarctic plants and many more which are representative species, are found also in Tasmania and in the mountains of temperate Australia; and Sir Joseph Hooker gives a list of thirty-eight species very characteristic of Europe and Northern Asia, but almost or quite unknown in the warmer regions, which yet reappear in temperate Australia. Other genera seem altogether Antarctic—that is, confined to the extreme southern lands and islands; and these often have representative species in Southern America, Tasmania, and New Zealand, while others occur only in one or two of these areas. Many north temperate genera also occur in the mountains of South Africa. On the other hand, few if any of the peculiar Australian or Antarctic types have spread northwards, except some of the former which have reached the mountains of Borneo, and a few of the latter which spread along the Andes to Mexico.

On these remarkable facts, of which I have given but the barest outline, Sir Joseph Hooker makes the following suggestive observations:—

"When I take a comprehensive view of the vegetation of the Old World, I am struck with the appearance it presents of there being a continuous current of vegetation (if I may so fancifully express myself) from Scandinavia to Tasmania; along, in short, the whole extent of that arc of the terrestrial sphere which presents the greatest continuity of land. In the first place Scandinavian genera, and even species, reappear everywhere from Lapland and Iceland to the tops of the Tasmanian Alps, in rapidly diminishing numbers it is true, but in vigorous development throughout. They abound on the Alps and Pyrenees, pass on to the Caucasus and Himalayas, thence they extend along the Khasia Mountains, and those of the peninsulas of India to those of Ceylon and the Malayan Archipelago (Java and Borneo), and after a hiatus of 30° they appear on the Alps of New South Wales, Victoria, and Tasmania, and beyond these again on those of New Zealand and the Antarctic Islands, many of the species remaining unchanged throughout! It matters not what the vegetation of the bases and flanks of these mountains may be; the northern species may be associated with alpine forms of Germanic, Siberian, Oriental, Chinese, American, Malayan, and finally Australian, and Antarctic types; but whereas these are all, more or less, local assemblages, the Scandinavian asserts his prerogative of ubiquity from Britain to beyond its antipodes."[189 - Introductory Essay On the Flora of Australia, p. 130.]

It is impossible to place the main facts more forcibly before the reader than in the above striking passage. It shows clearly that this portion of the New Zealand flora is due to wide-spread causes which have acted with even greater effect in other south temperate lands, and that in order to explain its origin we must grapple with the entire problem of the transfer of the north temperate flora to the southern hemisphere. Taking, therefore, the facts as given by Sir Joseph Hooker in the works already referred to, I shall discuss the whole question broadly, and shall endeavour to point out the general laws and subordinate causes that, in my opinion, have been at work in bringing about the anomalous phenomena of distribution he has done so much to make known and to elucidate.

Aggressive Power of the Scandinavian Flora.—The first important fact bearing upon this question is the wonderful aggressive and colonising power of the Scandinavian flora, as shown by the way in which it establishes itself in any temperate country to which it may gain access. About 150 species have thus established themselves in New Zealand, often taking possession of large tracts of country; about the same number are found in Australia, and nearly as many in the Atlantic states of America, where they form the commonest weeds. Whether or not we accept Mr. Darwin's explanation of this power as due to development in the most extensive land area of the globe where competition has been most severe and long-continued, the fact of the existence of this power remains, and we can see how important an agent it must be in the formation of the floras of any lands to which these aggressive plants have been able to gain access.

But not only are these plants pre-eminently capable of holding their own in any temperate country in the world, but they also have exceptional powers of migration and dispersal over seas and oceans. This is especially well shown by the case of the Azores, where no less than 400 out of a total of 478 flowering plants are identical with European species. These islands are more than 800 miles from Europe, and, as we have already seen in Chapter XII., there is no reason for supposing that they have ever been more nearly connected with it than they are now, since an extension of the European coast to the 1,000-fathom line would very little reduce the distance. Now it is a most interesting and suggestive fact that more than half the European genera which occur in the Australian flora occur also in the Azores, and in several cases even the species are identical in both.[190 - Hooker, On the Flora of Australia, p. 95.—H. C. Watson, in Godman's Azores, pp. 278-286.] The importance of such a case as this cannot be exaggerated, because it affords a demonstration of the power of the very plants in question to pass over wide areas of sea, some no doubt wholly through the air, carried by storms in the same way as the European birds and insects which annually reach the Azores, others by floating on the waters, or by a combination of the two methods; while some may have been carried by aquatic birds, to whose feathers many seeds have the power of attaching themselves, and some even in the stomachs of fruit or seed eating birds. We have in such facts as these a complete disproof of the necessity for those great changes of sea and land which are continually appealed to by those who think land-connection the only efficient means of accounting for the migration of animals or plants; but at the same time we do not neglect to make the fullest use of such moderate changes as all the evidence at our command leads us to believe have actually occurred, and especially of the former existence of intermediate islands, so often indicated by shoals in the midst of the deepest oceans.

Means by which Plants have migrated from North to South.—But if plants can thus pass in considerable numbers and variety over wide seas and oceans, it must be yet more easy for them to traverse continuous areas of land, whereever mountain-chains offer suitable stations at moderate intervals on which they might temporarily establish themselves. The facilities afforded for the transmission of plants by mountains has hardly received sufficient attention. The numerous land-slips, the fresh surfaces of broken rock and precipice, the debris of torrents, and the moraines deposited by glaciers, afford numerous unoccupied stations on which wind-borne seeds have a good chance of germinating. It is a well-known fact that fresh surfaces of soil or rock, such as are presented by railway cuttings and embankments, often produce plants strange to the locality, which survive for a few years, and then disappear as the normal vegetation gains strength and permanence.[191 - As this is a point of great interest in its bearing on the dispersal of plants by means of mountain ranges, I have endeavoured to obtain a few illustrative facts:—1. Mr. William Mitten, of Hurstpierpoint, Sussex, informs me that when the London and Brighton railway was in progress in his neighbourhood, Melilotus vulgaris made its appearance on the banks, remained for several years, and then altogether disappeared. Another case is that of Diplotaxis muralis, which formerly occurred only near the sea-coast of Sussex, and at Lewes; but since the railway was made has spread along it, and still maintains itself abundantly on the railway banks though rarely found anywhere else.2. A correspondent in Tasmania informs me that whenever the virgin forest is cleared in that island there invariably comes up a thick crop of a plant locally known as fire-weed—a species of Senecio, probably S. Australis. It never grows except where the fire has gone over the ground, and is unknown except in such places. My correspondent adds:—"This autumn I went back about thirty-five miles through a dense forest, along a track marked by some prospectors the year before, and in one spot where they had camped, and the fire had burnt the fallen logs, &c., there was a fine crop of 'fire-weed.' All around for many miles was a forest of the largest trees and dense scrub." Here we have a case in which burnt soil and ashes favour the germination of a particular plant, whose seeds are easily carried by the wind, and it is not difficult to see how this peculiarity might favour the dispersal of the species for enormous distances, by enabling it temporarily to grow and produce seeds on burnt spots.3. In answer to an inquiry on this subject, Mr. H. C. Watson has been kind enough to send me a detailed account of the progress of vegetation on the railway banks and cuttings about Thames Ditton. This account is written from memory, but as Mr. Watson states that he took a great interest in watching the process year by year, there can be no reason to doubt the accuracy of his memory. I give a few extracts which bear especially on the subject we are discussing."One rather remarkable biennial plant appeared early (the second year, as I recollect) and renewed itself either two or three years, namely, Isatis tinctoria—a species usually supposed, to be one of our introduced, but pretty well naturalised, plants. The nearest stations then or since known to me for this Isatis are on chalk about Guildford, twenty miles distant. There were two or three plants of it at first, never more than half a dozen. Once since I saw a plant of Isatis on the railway bank near Vauxhall."Close by Ditton Station three species appeared which may be called interlopers. The biennial Barbarea precox, one of these, is the least remarkable, because it might have come as seed in the earth from some garden, or possibly in the Thames gravel (used as ballast). At first it increased to several plants, then became less numerous, and will soon, in all probability, become extinct, crowded out by other plants. The biennial Petroselinum segetum was at first one very luxuriant plant on the slope of the embankment. It increased by seed into a dozen or a score, and is now nearly if not quite extinct. The third species is Linaria purpurea, not strictly a British plant, but one established in some places on old walls. A single root of it appeared on the chalk facing of the embankment by Ditton Station. It has remained there several years and grown into a vigorous specimen. Two or three smaller examples are now seen by it, doubtless sprung from some of the hundreds or thousands of seeds shed by the original one plant. The species is not included in Salmon and Brewer's Flora of Surrey."The main line of the railway has introduced into Ditton parish the perennial Arabis hirsuta, likely to become a permanent inhabitant. The species is found on the chalk and greensand miles away from Thames Ditton; but neither in this parish nor in any adjacent parish, so far as known to myself or to the authors of the flora of the county, does it occur. Some years after the railway was made a single root of this Arabis was observed in the brickwork of an arch by which the railway is carried over a public road. A year or two afterwards there were three or four plants. In some later year I laid some of the ripened seed-pods between the bricks in places where the mortar had partly crumbled out. Now there are several scores of specimens in the brickwork of the arch. It is presumable that the first seed may have been brought from Guildford. But how could it get on to the perpendicular face of the brickwork?"The Bee Orchis (Ophrys apifera), plentiful on some of the chalk lands in Surrey, is not a species of Thames Ditton, or (as I presume) of any adjacent parish. Thus, I was greatly surprised some years back to see about a hundred examples of it in flower in one clayey field either on the outskirts of Thames Ditton or just within the limits of the adjoining parish of Cobham. I had crossed this same field in a former year without observing the Ophrys there. And on finding it in the one field I closely searched the surrounding fields and copses, without finding it anywhere else. Gradually the plants became fewer and fewer in that one field, and some six or eight years after its first discovery there the species had quite disappeared again. I guessed it had been introduced with chalk, but could obtain no evidence to show this."4. Mr. A. Bennett, of Croydon, has kindly furnished me with some information on the temporary vegetation of the banks and cuttings on the railway from Yarmouth to Caistor in Norfolk, where it passes over extensive sandy Denes with a sparse vegetation. The first year after the railway was made the banks produced abundance of Œnothera odorata and Delphinium Ajacis (the latter only known thirty miles off in cornfields in Cambridgeshire), with Atriplex patula and A. deltoidea. Gradually the native sand plants—Carices, Grasses, Galium verum, &c., established themselves, and year by year covered more ground till the new introductions almost completely disappeared. The same phenomenon was observed in Cambridgeshire between Chesterton and Newmarket, where, the soil being different, Stellaria media and other annuals appeared in large patches; but these soon gave way to a permanent vegetation of grasses, composites, &c., so that in the third year no Stellaria was to be seen.5. Mr. T. Kirk (writing in 1878) states that—"in Auckland, where a dense sward of grass is soon formed, single specimens of the European milk Thistle (Carduus marianus) have been known for the past fifteen years; but although they seeded freely, the seeds had no opportunity of germinating, so that the thistle did not spread. A remarkable exception to this rule occurred during the formation of the Onehunga railway, where a few seeds fell on disturbed soil, grew up and flowered. The railway works being suspended, the plant increased rapidly, and spread wherever it could find disturbed soil."Again:—"The fiddle-dock (Rumex pulcher) occurs in great abundance on the formation of new streets, &c., but soon becomes comparatively rare. It seems probable that it was one of the earliest plants naturalised here, but that it partially died out, its buried seeds retaining their vitality."Medicago sativa and Apium graveolens, are also noted as escapes from cultivation which maintain themselves for a time but soon die out. (Transactions of the New Zealand Institute, Vol. X. p. 367.)The preceding examples of the temporary establishment of plants on newly exposed soil, often at considerable distances from the localities they usually inhabit, might, no doubt, by further inquiry be greatly multiplied; but, unfortunately, the phenomenon has received little attention, and is not even referred to in the elaborate work of De Candolle (Géographie Botanique Raisonnée) in which almost every other aspect of the dispersion and distribution of plants is fully discussed. Enough has been advanced, however, to show that it is of constant occurrence, and from the point of view here advocated it becomes of great importance in explaining the almost world-wide distribution of many common plants of the north temperate zone.] But such a surface will, in the meantime, have acted as a fresh centre of dispersal; and thus a plant might pass on step by step, by means of stations temporarily occupied, till it reached a district where, the general conditions being more favourable, it was able to establish itself as a permanent member of the flora. Such, generally speaking, was probably the process by which the Scandinavian flora has made its way to the southern hemisphere; but it could hardly have done so to any important extent without the aid of those powerful causes explained in our eighth chapter—causes which acted as a constantly recurrent motive-power to produce that "continuous current of vegetation" from north to south across the whole width of the tropics referred to by Sir Joseph Hooker. Those causes were, the repeated changes of climate which, during all geological time, appear to have occurred in both hemispheres, culminating at rare intervals in glacial epochs, and which have been shown to depend upon changes of excentricity of the earth's orbit and the occurrence of summer or winter in aphelion, in conjunction with the slower and more irregular changes of geographical conditions; these combined causes acting chiefly through the agency of heat-bearing oceanic currents, and of snow- and ice-collecting highlands. Let us now briefly consider how such changes would act in favouring the dispersal of plants.

Elevation and Depression of the Snow Line as Aiding the Migration of Plants.—We have endeavoured to show (in an earlier portion of this volume) that wherever geographical or physical conditions were such as to produce any considerable amount of perpetual snow, this would be increased whenever a high degree of excentricity concurred with winter in aphelion, and diminished during the opposite phase. On all mountain ranges, therefore, which reached above the snow-line, there would be a periodical increase and decrease of snow, and when there were extensive areas of plateau at about the same level, the lowering of the snow-line might cause such an increased accumulation of snow as to produce great glaciers and ice-fields, such as we have seen occurred in South Africa during the last period of high excentricity. But along with such depression of the line of perpetual snow there would be a corresponding depression of the alpine and sub-alpine zones suitable for the growth of an arctic and temperate vegetation, and, what is perhaps more important, the depression would necessarily produce a great extension of the area of these zones on all high mountains, because as we descend the average slopes become less abrupt,—thus affording a number of new stations suitable for such temperate plants as might first reach them. But just above and below the snow-line is the area of most powerful disintegration and denudation, from the alternate action of frost and sun, of ice and water; and thus the more extended area would be subject to the constant occurrence of land-slips, berg-falls, and floods, with their accompanying accumulations of débris and of alluvial soil, affording innumerable stations in which solitary wind-borne seeds might germinate and temporarily establish themselves.

This lowering and rising of the snow-line each 10,500 years during periods of high excentricity, would occur in the northern and southern hemispheres alternately; and where there were high mountains within the tropics the two would probably overlap each other, so that the northern depression would make itself felt in a slight degree even across the equator some way into the southern hemisphere, and vice versâ; and even if the difference of the height of perpetual snow at the two extremes did not average more than a few hundred feet, this would be amply sufficient to supply the new and unoccupied stations needful to facilitate the migration of plants. It is well known that all great mountain ranges have undergone such fluctuations, as proved by ice-marks below the present level of snow and ice.

But the differences of temperature in the two hemispheres caused by the sun being in perihelion in the winter of the one while it was in aphelion during the same season in the other, would necessarily lead to increased aërial and marine currents, as already explained; and whenever geographical conditions were such as to favour the production of glaciation in any area these effects would become more powerful, and would further aid in the dispersal of the seeds of plants.

Changes of Climate Favourable to Migration.—It is clear then, that during periods when no glacial epochs were produced in the northern hemisphere, and even when a mild climate extended over the whole polar area, alternate changes of climate favouring the dispersal of plants would occur on all high mountains, and with particular force on such as rise above the snow-line. But during that long-continued, though comparatively recent, phase of high excentricity which produced an extensive glaciation in the northern hemisphere and local glaciations in the southern, these risings and lowerings of the snow-line on all mountain ranges would have been at a maximum, and would have been increased by the depression of the ocean which must have arisen from such a vast bulk of water being locked up in land-ice, and which depression would have produced the same effect as a general elevation of all the continents. At this time, too, aërial currents would have attained their maximum of force in both hemispheres; and this would greatly facilitate the dispersal of all wind-borne seeds as well as of those carried in the plumage or in the stomachs of birds, since we have seen, by the cases of the Azores and Bermuda, how vastly the migratory powers of birds are increased by a stormy atmosphere.

Migration from North to South has been long going on.—Now, if each phase of colder and warmer mountain-climate—each alternate depression and elevation of the snow-line, only helped on the migration of a few species some stages of the long route from the north to the south temperate regions, yet, during the long course of the Tertiary period there might well have arisen that representation of the northern flora in the southern hemisphere which is now so conspicuous. For it is very important to remark that it is not the existing flora alone that is represented, such as might have been conveyed during the last glacial epoch only; but we find a whole series of northern types evidently of varying degrees of antiquity, while even some genera characteristic of the southern hemisphere appear to have been originally derived from Europe. Thus Eucalyptus and Metrosideros have been determined by Dr. Ettingshausen from their fruits in the Eocene beds of Sheppey, while Pimelea, Leptomeria and four genera of Proteaceæ have been recognised by Professor Heer in the Miocene of Switzerland; and the former writer has detected fifty-five Australian forms in the Eocene plant beds of Häring (? Belgium).[192 - Sir Joseph Hooker informs me that he considers these identifications worthless, and Mr. Bentham has also written very strongly against the value of similar identifications by Heer and Unger. Giving due weight to the opinions of these eminent botanists we must admit that Australian genera have not yet been demonstrated to have existed in Europe during the Tertiary period; but, on the other hand, the evidence that they did so appears to have some weight, on account of the improbability that the numerous resemblances to Australian plants which have been noticed by different observers should all be illusory; while the well established fact of the former wide distribution of many tropical or now restricted types of plants and animals, so frequently illustrated in the present volume, removes the antecedent improbability which is supposed to attach to such identifications. I am myself the more inclined to accept them, because, according to the views here advocated, such migrations must have taken place at remote as well as at recent epochs; and the preservation of some of these types in Australia while they have become extinct in Europe, is exactly paralleled by numerous facts in the distribution of animals which have been already referred to in Chapter XIX., and elsewhere in this volume, and also repeatedly in my larger work.] Then we have such peculiar genera as Pachychladon and Notothlaspi of New Zealand said to have affinities with Arctic plants, while Stilbocarpa—another peculiar New Zealand genus—has its nearest allies in the Himalayan and Chinese Aralias. Following these are a whole host of very distinct species of northern genera which may date back to any part of the Tertiary period, and which occur in every south temperate land. Then we have closely allied representative species of European or Arctic plants; and, lastly, a number of identical species,—and these two classes are probably due entirely to the action of the last great glacial epoch, whose long continuance, and the repeated fluctuations of climate with which it commenced and terminated, rendered it an agent of sufficient power to have brought about this result.

Here, then, we have that constant or constantly recurrent process of dispersal acting throughout long periods with varying power—that "continuous current of vegetation" as it has been termed, which the facts demand; and the extraordinary phenomenon of the species and genera of European and even of Arctic plants being represented abundantly in South America, Australia, and New Zealand, thus adds another to the long series of phenomena which are rendered intelligible by frequent alternations of warmer and colder climates in either hemisphere, culminating, at long intervals and in favourable situations, in actual glacial epochs.

Geological Changes as Aiding Migration.—It will be well also to notice here, that there is another aid to dispersion dependent upon the changes effected by denudation during the long periods included in the duration of the species and genera of plants. A considerable number of the plants of the Miocene period of Europe were so much like existing species that although they have generally received fresh names they may well have been identical; and a large proportion of the vegetation during the whole Tertiary period consisted of genera which are still living.[193 - Out of forty-two genera from the Eocene of Sheppey enumerated by Dr. Ettingshausen in the Geological Magazine for January 1880, only two or three appear to be extinct, while there is a most extraordinary intermixture of tropical and temperate forms—Musa, Nipa, and Victoria, with Corylus, Prunus, Acer, &c. The rich Miocene flora of Switzerland, described by Professor Heer, presents a still larger proportion of living genera.] But from what is now known of the rate of sub-aërial denudation, we are sure, that during each division of this period many mountain chains must have been considerably lowered, while we know that some of the existing ranges have been greatly elevated. Ancient volcanoes, too, have been destroyed by denudation, and new ones have been built up, so that we may be quite sure that ample means for the transmission of temperate plants across the tropics, may have existed in countries where they are now no longer to be found. The great mountain masses of Guiana and Brazil, for example, must have been far more lofty before the sedimentary covering was denuded from their granitic bosses and metamorphic peaks, and may have aided the southern migration of plants before the final elevation of the Andes. And if Africa presents us with an example of a continent of vast antiquity, we may be sure that its great central plateaux once bore far loftier mountain ranges before they were reduced to their present condition by long ages of denudation.

Proofs of Migration by Way of the Andes.—We are now prepared to apply the principles above laid down to the explanation of the character and affinities of the various portions of the north temperate flora in the southern hemisphere, and especially in Australia and New Zealand.

At the present time the only unbroken chain of highlands and mountains connecting the Arctic and north temperate with the Antarctic lands is to be found in the American continent, the only break of importance being the comparatively low Isthmus of Panama, where there is a distance of about 300 miles occupied by rugged forest-clad hills, between the lofty peaks of Veragua and the northern extremity of the Andes of New Grenada. Such distances are, as we have already seen, no barrier to the diffusion of plants; and we should accordingly expect that this great continuous mountain-chain has formed the most effective agent in aiding the southward migration of the Arctic and north temperate vegetation. We do find, in fact, not only that a large number of northern genera and many species are scattered all along this line of route, but that at the end of the long journey, in Southern Chile and Fuegia, they have established themselves in such numbers as to form an important part of the flora of those countries. From the lists given in the works already referred to, it appears that there are between sixty and seventy northern genera in Fuegia and Southern Chile, while about forty of the species are absolutely identical with those of Europe and the Arctic regions. Considering how comparatively little the mountains of South Temperate America are yet known, this is a very remarkable result, and it proves that the transmission of species must have gone on up to comparatively recent times. Yet, as only a few of these species are now found along the line of migration, we see that they only occupied such stations temporarily; and we may connect their disappearance with the passing away of the last glacial period which, by raising the snow-line, reduced the area on which alone they could exist, and exposed them to the competition of indigenous plants from the belt of country immediately below them.

Now, just as these numerous species and genera have undoubtedly passed along the great American range of mountains, although only now found at its two extremes, so others have doubtless passed on further; and have found more suitable stations or less severe competition in the Antarctic continent and islands, in New Zealand, in Tasmania, and even in Australia itself. The route by which they may have reached these countries is easily marked out. Immediately south of Cape Horn, at a distance of only 500 miles, are the South Shetland Islands and Graham's Land, whence the Antarctic continent or a group of large islands probably extends across or around the south polar area to Victoria Land and thence to Adélie Land. The outlying Young Island, 12,000 feet high, is about 750 miles south of the Macquarie Islands, which may be considered a southern outlier of the New Zealand group; and the Macquarie Islands are about the same distance from the 1,000-fathom line at a point marking the probable southern extension of Tasmania. Other islands may have existed at intermediate points; but, even as it is, these distances are not greater than we know are traversed by plants both by flotation and by aërial currents, especially in such a stormy atmosphere as that of the Antarctic regions. Now, we may further assume, that what we know occurred within the Arctic circle also took place in the Antarctic—that is, that there have been alternations of climate during which some portion of what are now ice-clad lands became able to support a considerable amount of vegetation.[194 - The recent discovery by Lieutenant Jensen of a rich flora on rocky peaks rising out of the continental ice of Greenland, as well as the abundant vegetation of the highest northern latitudes, renders it possible that even now the Antarctic continent may not be wholly destitute of vegetation, although its climate and physical condition are far less favourable than those of the Arctic lands. (See Nature, Vol. XXI. p. 345.)] During such periods there would be a steady migration of plants from all southern circumpolar countries to people the comparatively unoccupied continent, and the southern extremity of America being considerably the nearest, and also being the best stocked with those northern types which have such great powers of migration and colonisation, such plants would form the bulk of the Antarctic vegetation, and during the continuance of the milder southern climate would occupy the whole area.

When the cold returned and the land again became ice-clad, these plants would be crowded towards the outer margins of the Antarctic land and its islands, and some of them would find their way across the sea to such countries as offered on their mountain summits suitable cool stations; and as this process of alternately receiving plants from Chile and Fuegia and transmitting them in all directions from the central Antarctic land may have been repeated several times during the Tertiary period, we have no difficulty in understanding the general community between the European and Antarctic plants found in all south temperate lands. Kerguelen's Land and The Crozets are within about the same distance from the Antarctic continent as New Zealand and Tasmania, and we need not therefore be surprised at finding in each of these islands some Fuegian species which have not reached the others. Of course, there will remain difficulties of detail, as there always must remain, so long as our knowledge of the past changes of the earth's surface and the history of the particular plants concerned is so imperfect. Sir Joseph Hooker notes, for example, the curious fact that several Compositæ common to three such remote localities as the Auckland Islands, Fuegia, and Kerguelen's Land, have no pappus or seed-down, while such as have pappus are in no case common even to two of these islands. Without knowing the exact history and distribution of the genera to which these plants belong it would be useless to offer any conjecture, except that they are ancient forms which may have survived great geographical changes, or may have some peculiar and exceptional means of dispersion.